From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Kevin Ryde Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: What to do about config.h, etc... Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2003 09:18:50 +1000 Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Message-ID: <873cltze3p.fsf@zip.com.au> References: <87vfyzoswd.fsf@raven.i.defaultvalue.org> <87vfywkv7b.fsf@zip.com.au> <87fzpzsq7t.fsf@raven.i.defaultvalue.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1047426205 27941 80.91.224.249 (11 Mar 2003 23:43:25 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2003 23:43:25 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Mar 12 00:43:24 2003 Return-path: Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 18stP1-0007GQ-00 for ; Wed, 12 Mar 2003 00:43:23 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10.13) id 18stN0-00017b-0C for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 11 Mar 2003 18:41:18 -0500 Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.10.13) id 18stJ3-0008Io-00 for guile-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Mar 2003 18:37:13 -0500 Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.10.13) id 18stCY-0005X3-00 for guile-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Mar 2003 18:30:31 -0500 Original-Received: from sunny.pacific.net.au ([203.2.228.40]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10.13) id 18st1W-00026V-00 for guile-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Mar 2003 18:19:06 -0500 Original-Received: from wisma.pacific.net.au (wisma.pacific.net.au [210.23.129.72]) by sunny.pacific.net.au with ESMTP id h2BNJ4OG019384 for ; Wed, 12 Mar 2003 10:19:04 +1100 (EST) Original-Received: from localhost (ppp97.dyn228.pacific.net.au [203.143.228.97]) by wisma.pacific.net.au (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id h2BNJ2xH010802 for ; Wed, 12 Mar 2003 10:19:03 +1100 (EST) Original-Received: from gg by localhost with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 18st1G-0000O4-00; Wed, 12 Mar 2003 09:18:50 +1000 Original-To: guile-devel@gnu.org User-Agent: Gnus/5.090013 (Oort Gnus v0.13) Emacs/21.2 (i386-pc-linux-gnu) X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1b5 Precedence: list List-Id: Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe: , Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:2069 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.guile.devel:2069 Rob Browning writes: > > True, though I've had some unpleasantness in the past with getting > AC_SUBST to expand things fully when I wanted it to (i.e. ${prefix}). $prefix is pesky, the gnu rule is to expand it at "make" time, not configure time, if I understand it correctly. Nosing around libguile/Makefile.am, I wonder if @prefix@ in the libpath.h setup should be $(prefix). Perhaps the other @foo@'s similarly (though they're substituted to ${prefix}/something, so end up obeying a make-time prefix at least). Mind you personally I think anyone who configures with one prefix and makes with another is probably asking for trouble, in general. _______________________________________________ Guile-devel mailing list Guile-devel@gnu.org http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel