From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Marius Vollmer Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: Manual reorganized Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2004 01:08:09 +0200 Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Message-ID: <873c2vx63q.fsf@zagadka.ping.de> References: <87y8nsxcgu.fsf@zip.com.au> <874qpjjqbn.fsf@zagadka.ping.de> <87fz92q3m9.fsf@zip.com.au> NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1092092940 30896 80.91.224.253 (9 Aug 2004 23:09:00 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 9 Aug 2004 23:09:00 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Aug 10 01:08:49 2004 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1BuJG3-0006Rl-00 for ; Tue, 10 Aug 2004 01:08:48 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1BuJJp-00057F-BY for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 09 Aug 2004 19:12:41 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1BuJJb-000577-UU for guile-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 09 Aug 2004 19:12:28 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1BuJJZ-00056s-Vj for guile-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 09 Aug 2004 19:12:27 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1BuJJZ-00056p-MW for guile-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 09 Aug 2004 19:12:25 -0400 Original-Received: from [195.253.8.218] (helo=mail.dokom.net) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1BuJFX-0001f9-01 for guile-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 09 Aug 2004 19:08:15 -0400 Original-Received: from [195.138.45.200] (helo=zagadka.ping.de) by mail.dokom.net with smtp (Exim 4.34) id 1BuJFW-0001Oz-DD for guile-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Aug 2004 01:08:14 +0200 Original-Received: (qmail 6969 invoked by uid 1000); 9 Aug 2004 23:08:09 -0000 Original-To: guile-devel@gnu.org In-Reply-To: <87fz92q3m9.fsf@zip.com.au> (Kevin Ryde's message of "Fri, 11 Jun 2004 11:34:38 +1000") User-Agent: Gnus/5.1006 (Gnus v5.10.6) Emacs/21.3 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:3929 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.guile.devel:3929 Kevin Ryde writes: > Marius Vollmer writes: >> >> What do you >> propose, should we document them. > > They're in the 1.6 manual, and I think I added some words to them. > >> What is their use? > > C "double" funcs corresponding to scheme level round and truncate. > > (There's a comment in the code about them being badly named, but it'd > be incompatible to change that now.) So what about deprecating them and providing scm_c_round and scm_c_truncate so that we can eventually use the names scm_round and scm_truncate for the C version of the Scheme procedures round and truncate? I think that would be the Right Thing. I will do this. -- GPG: D5D4E405 - 2F9B BCCC 8527 692A 04E3 331E FAF8 226A D5D4 E405 _______________________________________________ Guile-devel mailing list Guile-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel