From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Kevin Ryde Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: scm_cell vs threads build option Date: Tue, 04 Sep 2007 10:46:27 +1000 Message-ID: <873axv9s0s.fsf@zip.com.au> References: <87fy1x9a8u.fsf@zip.com.au> <87lkbovccu.fsf@raven.defaultvalue.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1188866815 25651 80.91.229.12 (4 Sep 2007 00:46:55 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2007 00:46:55 +0000 (UTC) To: guile-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Sep 04 02:46:55 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1ISMZ9-000815-Hj for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 04 Sep 2007 02:46:51 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1ISMZ7-0000lK-SX for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 03 Sep 2007 20:46:49 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1ISMZ5-0000lF-If for guile-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 03 Sep 2007 20:46:47 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1ISMYz-0000l3-5G for guile-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 03 Sep 2007 20:46:46 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1ISMYy-0000l0-U6 for guile-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 03 Sep 2007 20:46:40 -0400 Original-Received: from mailout1-4.pacific.net.au ([61.8.2.211] helo=mailout1.pacific.net.au) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1ISMYy-0007wS-D1 for guile-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 03 Sep 2007 20:46:40 -0400 Original-Received: from mailproxy1.pacific.net.au (mailproxy1.pacific.net.au [61.8.2.162]) by mailout1.pacific.net.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74DC232B77A for ; Tue, 4 Sep 2007 10:46:32 +1000 (EST) Original-Received: from localhost (ppp219B.dyn.pacific.net.au [61.8.33.155]) by mailproxy1.pacific.net.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id 084B08C1E for ; Tue, 4 Sep 2007 10:46:32 +1000 (EST) Original-Received: from gg by localhost with local (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1ISMYl-0000nK-JK for guile-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Sep 2007 10:46:27 +1000 In-Reply-To: <87lkbovccu.fsf@raven.defaultvalue.org> (Rob Browning's message of "Sun, 02 Sep 2007 17:09:21 -0700") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110007 (No Gnus v0.7) Emacs/22.1 (gnu/linux) X-Detected-Kernel: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:6772 Archived-At: Rob Browning writes: > > Perhaps Guile should use a different name for the threaded libs if > they're not compatible. I suppose that'd help against mysterious crashes, but leaves the same problem as in every incompatibility, ie. that add-ons do or don't switch, making various combinations unusable, or forcing everyone to recompile in lock-step, etc. _______________________________________________ Guile-devel mailing list Guile-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel