From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?iso-8859-1?Q?Court=E8s?=) Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: Some leftover bugs for this release Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 11:09:06 +0200 Message-ID: <873a6ngsst.fsf@gnu.org> References: <502659.49613.qm@web37903.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <87my4v3mvh.fsf@gnu.org> <825239.92029.qm@web37901.mail.mud.yahoo.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1253092194 7077 80.91.229.12 (16 Sep 2009 09:09:54 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 09:09:54 +0000 (UTC) To: guile-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Sep 16 11:09:48 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1MnqWJ-0006HC-27 for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 16 Sep 2009 11:09:47 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33557 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MnqWI-0002zB-A9 for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 16 Sep 2009 05:09:46 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MnqWA-0002z3-9b for guile-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 16 Sep 2009 05:09:38 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MnqW4-0002vk-VL for guile-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 16 Sep 2009 05:09:37 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=40356 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MnqW4-0002vb-RZ for guile-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 16 Sep 2009 05:09:32 -0400 Original-Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]:55686) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MnqW4-0005H7-DS for guile-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 16 Sep 2009 05:09:32 -0400 Original-Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1MnqVz-0006Cw-T9 for guile-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 16 Sep 2009 11:09:27 +0200 Original-Received: from laptop-147-210-128-170.labri.fr ([147.210.128.170]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 16 Sep 2009 11:09:27 +0200 Original-Received: from ludo by laptop-147-210-128-170.labri.fr with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 16 Sep 2009 11:09:27 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 30 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: laptop-147-210-128-170.labri.fr X-URL: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ X-Revolutionary-Date: 30 Fructidor an 217 de la =?iso-8859-1?Q?R=E9volutio?= =?iso-8859-1?Q?n?= X-PGP-Key-ID: 0xEA52ECF4 X-PGP-Key: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ludovic.asc X-PGP-Fingerprint: 821D 815D 902A 7EAB 5CEE D120 7FBA 3D4F EB1F 5364 X-OS: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:0R6GsDB5gKgoWncRRczyRY3LhrE= X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:9323 Archived-At: Hi Mike, Mike Gran writes: >> > Also, the netbsd build will likely fail because there is new >> > 'condition is always true' condition in array-handle.c:103 >> > >> > 100 SCM >> > 101 scm_array_handle_element_type (scm_t_array_handle *h) >> > 102 { >> > 103 >> if (h->element_type < 0 || h->element_type > SCM_ARRAY_ELEMENT_TYPE_LAST) >> > 104 abort (); /* guile programming error */ >> > 105 return scm_i_array_element_types[h->element_type]; >> > 106 } >> >> Hmm, an enum variable can possibly hold any integer value, so why would >> this always be true? Are you actually hitting this? [...] > So when I enable -Wtype-limits on my build, it warns for any enum > value that is beyond those enumerated in the type definition. The > smallest value in this enum is zero, hence the warning. Then we could just use ‘-Wtype-limits’ and remove the above run-time check. Andy? Thanks, Ludo’.