From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Neil Jerram Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: Benchmark tracking Date: Wed, 04 Nov 2009 23:34:13 +0000 Message-ID: <873a4tsw3u.fsf@ossau.uklinux.net> References: <871vkoldwc.fsf@ossau.uklinux.net> <87k4y6t0as.fsf@ossau.uklinux.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1257377676 24474 80.91.229.12 (4 Nov 2009 23:34:36 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 23:34:36 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Guile Development To: Andy Wingo Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Nov 05 00:34:29 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1N5pMy-00086N-6G for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 05 Nov 2009 00:34:28 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48093 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1N5pMx-0004zw-NS for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 04 Nov 2009 18:34:27 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1N5pMq-0004zW-TP for guile-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 04 Nov 2009 18:34:20 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1N5pMl-0004ym-Pw for guile-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 04 Nov 2009 18:34:20 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=39465 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1N5pMl-0004yj-N4 for guile-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 04 Nov 2009 18:34:15 -0500 Original-Received: from mail3.uklinux.net ([80.84.72.33]:58921) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1N5pMl-0002vt-4O for guile-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 04 Nov 2009 18:34:15 -0500 Original-Received: from arudy (host86-147-112-196.range86-147.btcentralplus.com [86.147.112.196]) by mail3.uklinux.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43A441F6B29; Wed, 4 Nov 2009 23:34:14 +0000 (GMT) Original-Received: from arudy (arudy [127.0.0.1]) by arudy (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A05F38023; Wed, 4 Nov 2009 23:34:13 +0000 (GMT) In-Reply-To: <87k4y6t0as.fsf@ossau.uklinux.net> (Neil Jerram's message of "Wed, 04 Nov 2009 22:03:39 +0000") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.4-2.6 X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:9633 Archived-At: Neil Jerram writes: > Andy Wingo writes: > >> Also, we should have more of the stock Gabriel benchmarks, like in the >> Clinger or Feeley set. > > I found this page: > http://www.ccs.neu.edu/home/will/Twobit/benchmarksAbout.html > > Is that what you meant? > > Do you know anything about how this code is licensed (and hence if we > can add it to the Guile repository and/or distribution)? On second thoughts, I don't think we need to add them to the repository or distribution. Instead I can automate the process of downloading them, storing them just long enough to run the benchmarks, and recording the results. Neil