From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?iso-8859-1?Q?Court=E8s?=) Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: Missing plots for new benchmarks Date: Sun, 28 Feb 2010 18:43:46 +0100 Message-ID: <873a0l45nx.fsf@gnu.org> References: <871vgnmjw8.fsf@gnu.org> <878waf5xjf.fsf@ossau.uklinux.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1267379069 26342 80.91.229.12 (28 Feb 2010 17:44:29 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 28 Feb 2010 17:44:29 +0000 (UTC) To: guile-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Feb 28 18:44:19 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NlnBi-0007ho-GJ for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 28 Feb 2010 18:44:18 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45523 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NlnBi-000097-27 for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 28 Feb 2010 12:44:18 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NlnBZ-00008i-4T for guile-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 28 Feb 2010 12:44:09 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=40522 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NlnBY-00008a-Cu for guile-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 28 Feb 2010 12:44:08 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NlnBX-00032d-Ik for guile-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 28 Feb 2010 12:44:08 -0500 Original-Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]:33542) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NlnBX-00032R-CF for guile-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 28 Feb 2010 12:44:07 -0500 Original-Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NlnBS-0007cs-TN for guile-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 28 Feb 2010 18:44:03 +0100 Original-Received: from acces.bordeaux.inria.fr ([193.50.110.5]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 28 Feb 2010 18:44:02 +0100 Original-Received: from ludo by acces.bordeaux.inria.fr with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 28 Feb 2010 18:44:02 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 39 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: acces.bordeaux.inria.fr X-URL: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ X-Revolutionary-Date: 10 =?iso-8859-1?Q?Vent=F4se?= an 218 de la =?iso-8859-1?Q?R=E9volution?= X-PGP-Key-ID: 0xEA52ECF4 X-PGP-Key: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ludovic.asc X-PGP-Fingerprint: 83C4 F8E5 10A3 3B4C 5BEA D15D 77DD 95E2 EA52 ECF4 X-OS: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:CSmION5fOhQiez9ex0MDVZLbXM8= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:9998 Archived-At: Hi Neil, Neil Jerram writes: > ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes: >> There are no plots for the new benchmarks that were added recently >> (‘structs.bm’ and ‘vlists.bm’). Could you add them? >> >> Optionally, could you add the benchmark title to the HTML code itself so >> that they can be searched from the browser? > > I've made these changes now. Great, thanks! > I also removed the hardcoded Y axis range, as I think it was obscuring > useful information (especially now that some of the benchmarks are > notably faster than when we started collecting these results). Nice. > Please let me know if you have any comments, or can think of further > improvements... Some of the benchmarks in vlists.bm are comparative: the idea is to see how vlists compare to raw lists. In these cases, it would be nice to see the benchmarks being compared use the same Y scale. However, it may be inconvenient or inelegant to customize the benchmark machinery for this. > (BTW, I really am hoping to be more available again for Guile work > soon. Apologies all round for my general lack of contribution > recently...) Heh, that’s perfectly fine with me! Thanks, Ludo’.