From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Jose A. Ortega Ruiz" Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: Can `make tags' generate tags for Scheme source, as well as C? Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2010 14:12:30 +0200 Message-ID: <8739sbehjl.fsf@newton.homeunix.net> References: <87d3skxjd6.fsf@ossau.uklinux.net> <87ocbzf4xn.fsf@gnu.org> <87pqvphb4d.fsf@ossau.uklinux.net> <87r5g5h99i.fsf@newton.homeunix.net> <87lj64pfto.fsf@ossau.uklinux.net> <877hhoe5an.fsf@newton.homeunix.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1286885649 1649 80.91.229.12 (12 Oct 2010 12:14:09 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2010 12:14:09 +0000 (UTC) Cc: guile-devel@gnu.org, Neil Jerram To: Andy Wingo Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Oct 12 14:14:07 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1P5dk3-00017P-QB for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 12 Oct 2010 14:14:04 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48680 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1P5dk3-0007FP-2Z for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 12 Oct 2010 08:14:03 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=56767 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1P5die-0006SF-EF for guile-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Oct 2010 08:12:38 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1P5dic-0002KP-Ut for guile-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Oct 2010 08:12:36 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-ww0-f49.google.com ([74.125.82.49]:46370) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1P5dic-0002K4-Qj for guile-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Oct 2010 08:12:34 -0400 Original-Received: by wwd20 with SMTP id 20so4037069wwd.30 for ; Tue, 12 Oct 2010 05:12:33 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:sender:received:from:to:cc :subject:in-reply-to:references:user-agent:x-attribution:x-url:date :message-id:mime-version:content-type; bh=Iyl/eRS6zWfeiXahuBbI4a4uwqOKQMvp81Gk+TxZGJo=; b=KydBBf28I/Os4mIp3ylWMzp2knQ5KnsHorZmmOo/gYXma/qv49FR9vO+k5i2rOfzDc t9xb8R65Tb6e3LvjE8OammzRdNk+r2YcjWj9XBOgPMtGdvhQRmbPndSGGXCvLcASKK1k klxiQN2rb6Q+4YQrq1VwasM98kthrkKkxm/zE= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=sender:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:user-agent :x-attribution:x-url:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type; b=u3hXg8kwPjNuGOMbcrDMvRV5htfcS4Lkgnmu5TA4UGYXfjEEwbASGSdzuqRQw/lYRo uoS9kzZLUFvUrmebwxfk7H+UQK8fml8Lwoy3PtSJB0AycYpjQg2ikqazspxz4C3VmGbt Rk1z7lwrMp0x+zBz9FtASxDg39N1Wr0VKpVpQ= Original-Received: by 10.227.153.11 with SMTP id i11mr6901324wbw.150.1286885553480; Tue, 12 Oct 2010 05:12:33 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from newton.homeunix.net (31.Red-79-155-158.dynamicIP.rima-tde.net [79.155.158.31]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id x15sm3010188weq.31.2010.10.12.05.12.31 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Tue, 12 Oct 2010 05:12:32 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=newton.homeunix.net ident=jao) by newton.homeunix.net with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1P5diY-0000yv-Bf; Tue, 12 Oct 2010 14:12:30 +0200 In-Reply-To: (Andy Wingo's message of "Tue, 12 Oct 2010 11:36:38 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-Attribution: jao X-URL: X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:11038 Archived-At: On Tue, Oct 12 2010, Andy Wingo wrote: [...] >> Expecting anything to work in Geiser before starting (or connecting to) >> a REPL is a bad expectation, yes :) > > Could it ask to start a new Guile or connect to a Guile? Every time you try a geiser command without an active REPL, there's an error message in the echo area saying "No Geiser REPL for this buffer (try M-x run-geiser)" If that message wasn't displayed in Neil's case, that's a bug. >> I don't think it's a good a idea to load modules behind the user's >> back. > > Could it ask? :-) It could, but it's a lot of work :-) It can also be annoying to keep answering questions: i'd need to keep track of whether i've already asked, options would be needed to deactivate the behaviour, to make auto-loading the default... more work... I think i'd need one or two more users feeling the need for this feature (i don't) :-).