From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?iso-8859-1?Q?Court=E8s?=) Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: [bug #31680] R6RS string literal intraline whitespace removal Date: Tue, 08 Feb 2011 22:24:45 +0100 Message-ID: <8739nycj8i.fsf@gnu.org> References: <20101117-131540.sv2373.30272@savannah.gnu.org> <20101118-150512.sv73118.96725@savannah.gnu.org> <20101118-185600.sv20118.39996@savannah.gnu.org> <20101118-204517.sv2373.2325@savannah.gnu.org> <20101118-202400.sv20118.12854@savannah.gnu.org> <20101118-215151.sv73118.97070@savannah.gnu.org> <20101119-152417.sv20118.80187@savannah.gnu.org> <20101119-175733.sv73118.4023@savannah.gnu.org> <20110121-073516.sv20118.98584@savannah.gnu.org> <20110121-082232.sv20118.64753@savannah.gnu.org> <878vxrxwsz.fsf@industria.weinholt.se> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1297200334 31495 80.91.229.12 (8 Feb 2011 21:25:34 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2011 21:25:34 +0000 (UTC) To: guile-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Feb 08 22:25:27 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Pmv3n-0000Zr-6C for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 08 Feb 2011 22:25:19 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59629 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Pmv3m-00062m-80 for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 08 Feb 2011 16:25:18 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=40794 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Pmv3f-00060a-9A for guile-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Feb 2011 16:25:12 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Pmv3c-0005lH-S4 for guile-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Feb 2011 16:25:10 -0500 Original-Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]:44209) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Pmv3c-0005hm-Mi for guile-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Feb 2011 16:25:08 -0500 Original-Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Pmv3Z-0000QM-Eq for guile-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Feb 2011 22:25:05 +0100 Original-Received: from reverse-83.fdn.fr ([80.67.176.83]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 08 Feb 2011 22:25:05 +0100 Original-Received: from ludo by reverse-83.fdn.fr with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 08 Feb 2011 22:25:05 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 18 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: reverse-83.fdn.fr X-URL: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ X-Revolutionary-Date: 20 =?iso-8859-1?Q?Pluvi=F4se?= an 219 de la =?iso-8859-1?Q?R=E9volution?= X-PGP-Key-ID: 0xEA52ECF4 X-PGP-Key: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ludovic.asc X-PGP-Fingerprint: 83C4 F8E5 10A3 3B4C 5BEA D15D 77DD 95E2 EA52 ECF4 X-OS: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu User-Agent: Gnus/5.110011 (No Gnus v0.11) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:FqtRrxojKCZM54hLA3yiYhOdyHs= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 80.91.229.12 X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:11545 Archived-At: Hello, Andy Wingo writes: > On Tue 08 Feb 2011 00:13, Göran Weinholt writes: > >> I'm wondering if it wouldn't make more sense to have these reader >> options by associated with each port. > > Probably, yes. Would be a larger refactor, though. I think ports and reader syntax are orthogonal. Instead I’m in favor of multiple ‘read’ procedures and using the ‘current-reader’ fluid to make sure the current reader is inherited. Thanks, Ludo’.