From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andy Wingo Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: Patch: New section "Invoking Guile" for chapter "Programming in Scheme" Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2011 13:23:53 +0200 Message-ID: <8739irbm0m.fsf@pobox.com> References: <8CDD0063C9BEB29-FC8-5987@web-mmc-d08.sysops.aol.com> <8CDD0D662A18273-1820-10289@webmail-m029.sysops.aol.com> <8CDD19915ED74FC-D20-21138@webmail-d017.sysops.aol.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1309436355 30283 80.91.229.12 (30 Jun 2011 12:19:15 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2011 12:19:15 +0000 (UTC) Cc: guile-devel@gnu.org To: Mark Harig Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Jun 30 14:19:11 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QcGD9-000353-3k for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 14:19:11 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:49573 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QcGD8-0002CR-5C for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 08:19:10 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:42340) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QcFxM-0006vs-KX for guile-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 08:02:58 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QcFxK-0007XA-MS for guile-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 08:02:52 -0400 Original-Received: from a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com ([64.74.157.62]:47174 helo=sasl.smtp.pobox.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QcFxK-0007Wt-9K for guile-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 08:02:50 -0400 Original-Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE0505A17; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 08:05:02 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=sasl; bh=sbTW9B97aR9G PVEOB/+UkRt/vKE=; b=Vsy++fzTfUy6fZNXg5DVgwawIjsAT263ve7C/N+OsfqE 6m66OBPq/3R7F72VKG2m/IWRn78Wne0+t/AX/hXQ9JV9ZGRQH9sud+FdtPm6bXB1 9KEcu5TLzUVwsVQXdenstyACDuDS8/FaldcFbFOEsMQGsxDsoJuN4s+3FsSJ5p4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=sasl; b=gJJGDi HROpJ4Gw3Qz+BT63EIDRCyl4VLHrTLrtRmTnXMbZiCFAw/vSv3Dl0yQJroyAPQMD yHcx5qjc8KLmWcykUiVaWp/xosBA22ofPMDzs8Yt8ujAP3Q7XLd2pXh/SjkEQcrZ iCTZIKT5pyrBwU23P6eELEqLcBBACrjW6Ki4c= Original-Received: from a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 846F55A16; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 08:05:02 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from badger (unknown [90.164.198.39]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8E95A5A15; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 08:05:01 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <8CDD19915ED74FC-D20-21138@webmail-d017.sysops.aol.com> (Mark Harig's message of "Mon, 25 Apr 2011 15:49:55 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.3 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 2EE02760-A311-11E0-A351-5875C023C68D-02397024!a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta) X-Received-From: 64.74.157.62 X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:12608 Archived-At: Hi Mark, On Mon 25 Apr 2011 21:49, Mark Harig writes: >>=20 >> > On Sun, Apr 24, 2011 at 04:33:44PM +0200, Andy Wingo wrote: >> >> your patches should be "atomic" >> > >> > "3. No patch introduces a regression: after applying any >> > initial part of the series, the resulting project still >> > compiles and works, and has no bugs that it didn=E2=80=99t have >> > before." >>=20 >> Right, at the end of applying all of your patches, I'm sure that's the >> case; however the first patch adds an @include without adding the >> appropriate file, so applying just the first patch without the following >> two would yield a project that doesn't compile. I just meant that you >> need to squish the first two or three of them together. I can do that >> when I apply them, though. I went ahead and did this. Your commit logs were good but in the future please provide an initial description line, and wrap the change descriptions to 72 characters. See any of the Guile commit messages for examples. > In order to expedite this change, I am attaching the three updated patche= s. I'm sorry that our back-and-forth distracted us from actually making forward progress. I have applied your patches, and the changes should be in 2.0.2's manual. Thanks again, Andy --=20 http://wingolog.org/