From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andy Wingo Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: [PATCH] Improvements to exact rationals et al Date: Thu, 05 Jan 2012 11:27:05 -0500 Message-ID: <8739bunmhy.fsf@pobox.com> References: <8739f5tlu9.fsf@yeeloong.netris.org> <874nzjrwi8.fsf@yeeloong.netris.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1325780839 12568 80.91.229.12 (5 Jan 2012 16:27:19 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2012 16:27:19 +0000 (UTC) Cc: guile-devel@gnu.org To: Mark H Weaver Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Jan 05 17:27:14 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Riq9p-0002rs-7K for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 05 Jan 2012 17:27:13 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:36525 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Riq9o-0002dy-Oq for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 05 Jan 2012 11:27:12 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:36151) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Riq9m-0002dh-5m for guile-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 05 Jan 2012 11:27:11 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Riq9k-0002qZ-Pc for guile-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 05 Jan 2012 11:27:10 -0500 Original-Received: from a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com ([74.115.168.62]:52802 helo=sasl.smtp.pobox.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Riq9k-0002qR-Le for guile-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 05 Jan 2012 11:27:08 -0500 Original-Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A0358A0F; Thu, 5 Jan 2012 11:27:08 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=P2ZBLitEr62ZNn8u3tUJexEsLZQ=; b=loLTr4 Atb/1Qqcac6Nj6CWiv8vaV3Ma90JuEKW0bGctxWrDwoy7Ny0RRONhXoPhlzhtuNS xjPAoT6f+JN2my7iTFRdsgm0etjRC12WLYIPPRbyC6jETLKlJRzLPB+Hz5vEg0C0 lOUqrOEy5+sTW3lY7UmBICWY/3gZgGH+z0POg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=M8eqOEOtDcmipa2WH4tIrT94gSRUQzVs 6W4bZ9HBjre7pBsw0mdMOtsYESmQPmspoHsWWdCn+IVwUq9wlvmp2jSV/e30exrN L+UoGzYa5FhmudweLkKHlL2hOGv0vFUhlTRwNyZpTd9uglzqQfMzvCsUVNZGWsLc LygfL019eos= Original-Received: from a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 025D38A0D; Thu, 5 Jan 2012 11:27:08 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from badger (unknown [65.190.4.135]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6E43A8A0C; Thu, 5 Jan 2012 11:27:07 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <874nzjrwi8.fsf@yeeloong.netris.org> (Mark H. Weaver's message of "Sat, 08 Oct 2011 17:42:07 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.3 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 1C3D4DA2-37BA-11E1-952D-65B1DE995924-02397024!a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta) X-Received-From: 74.115.168.62 X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:13318 Archived-At: On Sat 08 Oct 2011 17:42, Mark H Weaver writes: > On second thought, I've decided that this patch set needs a bit more > work before it is ready for submission. I hope to post an improved > version soon. Cool, take your time. It looks like an interesting patch set, though I haven't taken the time to understand all of it. If you don't mind, do post a version of the patch set to the list before pushing, to give folks a couple days in which to give feedback. Cheers, Andy -- http://wingolog.org/