From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andy Wingo Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: Thread+GC issues on ARM Date: Sat, 07 Jan 2012 02:39:05 +0100 Message-ID: <8739bsi952.fsf@pobox.com> References: <87ipl6i15a.fsf@neil-laptop.ossau.uklinux.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1325900358 21072 80.91.229.12 (7 Jan 2012 01:39:18 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 7 Jan 2012 01:39:18 +0000 (UTC) Cc: rlb@defaultvalue.org, guile-devel@gnu.org To: Neil Jerram Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Jan 07 02:39:14 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RjLFZ-00079w-QV for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 07 Jan 2012 02:39:13 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:49341 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RjLFZ-0001WX-C0 for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 06 Jan 2012 20:39:13 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:52722) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RjLFW-0001WS-Ic for guile-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 06 Jan 2012 20:39:11 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RjLFV-0003Vq-CB for guile-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 06 Jan 2012 20:39:10 -0500 Original-Received: from a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com ([74.115.168.62]:40128 helo=sasl.smtp.pobox.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RjLFV-0003Vl-6q for guile-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 06 Jan 2012 20:39:09 -0500 Original-Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE79D872D; Fri, 6 Jan 2012 20:39:08 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=+p02LCxHZweG2WvTYtRWVH6JoDA=; b=cO+ox0 DsYZOKLxOLeFqbrunjdqMTyarkjEz99WKgQoVqXoVqcUlh3N+mtpQJXtK2eWlNH1 O5CaDp7tymxsX2JQvCQwDE/pv6b5gZ0jUAVyORcLYA3On8p50n4MVThhI7U+Mck0 /msVZqVWxaqRcOyXAl4Jmk7jOU1oWltixmwjY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=UgiqkoLxyibKkHWqQEi72fMiXIkHLH+9 8tXSXKmO+vVmUS3laSNLl4H1Nm5Ia8cmCzH5bjUU910gYyOcBRLGrQ3HzVfZCkhz 2eUOx6H9m8hgvoJTOFdipjOmhtuvKILmqNMxq/aNDmUijlGyENv59M0rHYj0bzXV D8uAvvS162M= Original-Received: from a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6EFD872C; Fri, 6 Jan 2012 20:39:08 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from badger (unknown [90.164.198.39]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 24DFF872B; Fri, 6 Jan 2012 20:39:08 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <87ipl6i15a.fsf@neil-laptop.ossau.uklinux.net> (Neil Jerram's message of "Sat, 24 Dec 2011 12:50:57 +0000") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.3 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 642EBBD4-38D0-11E1-B12B-65B1DE995924-02397024!a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta) X-Received-From: 74.115.168.62 X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:13385 Archived-At: On Sat 24 Dec 2011 13:50, Neil Jerram writes: > Just in case anyone else is looking at this too, I just wanted to > announce that I'm investigating why the Debian Guile 2.0.3 fails to pass > 'make check' on ARM How's it going? :-) Andy -- http://wingolog.org/