From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Mark H Weaver Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: [Guile-commits] GNU Guile branch, stable-2.0, updated. v2.0.7-131-gb946e08 Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2013 05:38:55 -0500 Message-ID: <8738wgyb7k.fsf@tines.lan> References: <87bob5xklz.fsf@tines.lan> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1362047952 10451 80.91.229.3 (28 Feb 2013 10:39:12 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2013 10:39:12 +0000 (UTC) Cc: guile-devel@gnu.org To: Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Feb 28 11:39:36 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1UB0tj-0001p5-Hj for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 28 Feb 2013 11:39:35 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:54278 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UB0tO-0008B6-E5 for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 28 Feb 2013 05:39:14 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:35145) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UB0tL-0008Ax-CP for guile-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 28 Feb 2013 05:39:12 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UB0tJ-00060W-RQ for guile-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 28 Feb 2013 05:39:11 -0500 Original-Received: from world.peace.net ([96.39.62.75]:38842) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UB0tJ-00060O-NY; Thu, 28 Feb 2013 05:39:09 -0500 Original-Received: from 209-6-91-212.c3-0.smr-ubr1.sbo-smr.ma.cable.rcn.com ([209.6.91.212] helo=tines.lan) by world.peace.net with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1UB0tD-0000m3-DA; Thu, 28 Feb 2013 05:39:03 -0500 In-Reply-To: <87bob5xklz.fsf@tines.lan> (Mark H. Weaver's message of "Wed, 27 Feb 2013 21:01:12 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.2 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 96.39.62.75 X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:15837 Archived-At: I wrote: > This seems questionable to me. It may currently be the case that N32 > and O32 are more common, but that is unlikely to remain the case for > much longer. > > Is there any way to specify the N64 ABI for MIPS? Please disregard this message. I should have looked at the patch and not just the commit log. Apologies for the wasted bandwidth. Mark