From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Rob Browning Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: Unintentional conflict in define-immutable-type? Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2015 15:33:22 -0600 Message-ID: <8737vrcel9.fsf@trouble.defaultvalue.org> References: <87610yfwes.fsf@trouble.defaultvalue.org> <87io4xivcv.fsf@netris.org> <87h9keeq9l.fsf@trouble.defaultvalue.org> <87mvtzuoia.fsf@netris.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1448660014 13746 80.91.229.3 (27 Nov 2015 21:33:34 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2015 21:33:34 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= , guile-devel@gnu.org To: Mark H Weaver Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Nov 27 22:33:31 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1a2Qe2-0002Rc-OC for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 27 Nov 2015 22:33:30 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:58592 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a2Qe5-0006Tu-Gm for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 27 Nov 2015 16:33:33 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:41493) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a2Qdz-0006To-VG for guile-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 27 Nov 2015 16:33:28 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a2Qdv-0003wR-R8 for guile-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 27 Nov 2015 16:33:27 -0500 Original-Received: from defaultvalue.org ([70.85.129.156]:56485) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a2Qdv-0003vg-Mk; Fri, 27 Nov 2015 16:33:23 -0500 Original-Received: from trouble.defaultvalue.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (Authenticated sender: rlb@defaultvalue.org) by defaultvalue.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E7C17200D0; Fri, 27 Nov 2015 15:33:22 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: by trouble.defaultvalue.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 92D6814E062; Fri, 27 Nov 2015 15:33:22 -0600 (CST) In-Reply-To: <87mvtzuoia.fsf@netris.org> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.20.1 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.5.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 70.85.129.156 X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:18071 Archived-At: Mark H Weaver writes: > I guess that wouldn't work. After (define-immutable-type ...), > it's important that remain bound to the RTD in the module where > 'define-immutable-type' was evaluated. The other procedures defined by > 'define-immutable-type' refer to and rely on it being bound to the > RTD. Ahh, right. So I suppose if you want as the goops name, then you really do just have to choose something other than foo for the constructor within the module. Thanks -- Rob Browning rlb @defaultvalue.org and @debian.org GPG as of 2011-07-10 E6A9 DA3C C9FD 1FF8 C676 D2C4 C0F0 39E9 ED1B 597A GPG as of 2002-11-03 14DD 432F AE39 534D B592 F9A0 25C8 D377 8C7E 73A4