From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Mathieu Lirzin Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: Elisp branch ready for merge (??) Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2016 18:56:56 +0100 Message-ID: <8737rwnbiv.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87egbo0zxc.fsf@dustycloud.org> <87d1r71rag.fsf@dustycloud.org> <8760wz14q9.fsf@dustycloud.org> <87io0yppbn.fsf@gnu.org> <87y49uyxhb.fsf@dustycloud.org> <87d1r1235o.fsf@dustycloud.org> <87wpp95f80.fsf@gnu.org> <87a8m50yfq.fsf@dustycloud.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1457719049 21878 80.91.229.3 (11 Mar 2016 17:57:29 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2016 17:57:29 +0000 (UTC) Cc: guile-devel To: Christopher Allan Webber Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Mar 11 18:57:14 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1aeRJK-0002qs-4v for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 11 Mar 2016 18:57:14 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:57000 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aeRJJ-0002MY-65 for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 11 Mar 2016 12:57:13 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:46367) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aeRJ9-0002JY-7d for guile-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 11 Mar 2016 12:57:04 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aeRJ5-0004Qy-8j for guile-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 11 Mar 2016 12:57:03 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:50394) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aeRJ5-0004Qt-4U; Fri, 11 Mar 2016 12:56:59 -0500 Original-Received: from mek33-4-82-236-46-88.fbx.proxad.net ([82.236.46.88]:40308 helo=godel) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1aeRJ4-0005s3-I5; Fri, 11 Mar 2016 12:56:58 -0500 In-Reply-To: <87a8m50yfq.fsf@dustycloud.org> (Christopher Allan Webber's message of "Fri, 11 Mar 2016 08:30:33 -0800") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:18217 Archived-At: Christopher Allan Webber writes: > Mathieu Lirzin writes: > [...] >> Small nitpick. Could you remove the extra spaces at the start of >> indented lines? :) >> >> I know this practice is/was a common practice in Guile but even if it >> looks prettier with indentation, this is not the proper change log >> format described by GCS and recognized by 'change-log-mode' in Emacs. > > I could... but I'm hesitant to do so if it's not the standard ways to do > things in Guile's repository. I'll leave that question to whoever is > interested in merging it. If they'd like me to change it, I'll do it, > and since they have commit access, I consider them the authority. Sure, it will be an opportunity to discuss this major issue! ;) -- Mathieu Lirzin