From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Marius Vollmer Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: gen gc Date: 18 Jul 2002 00:54:03 +0200 Sender: guile-devel-admin@gnu.org Message-ID: <871ya2ezjo.fsf@zagadka.ping.de> References: <15669.59575.560391.128570@blauw.xs4all.nl> NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1026946525 865 127.0.0.1 (17 Jul 2002 22:55:25 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2002 22:55:25 +0000 (UTC) Cc: guile-devel@gnu.org Return-path: Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 17Uxhb-0000Dq-00 for ; Thu, 18 Jul 2002 00:55:24 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 17UxhR-00050F-00; Wed, 17 Jul 2002 18:55:13 -0400 Original-Received: from dialin.speedway42.dip85.dokom.de ([195.138.43.85] helo=zagadka.ping.de) by fencepost.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 17UxgM-0004zI-00 for ; Wed, 17 Jul 2002 18:54:06 -0400 Original-Received: (qmail 30557 invoked by uid 1000); 17 Jul 2002 22:54:03 -0000 Original-To: hanwen@cs.uu.nl In-Reply-To: <15669.59575.560391.128570@blauw.xs4all.nl> Original-Lines: 13 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2 Errors-To: guile-devel-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:818 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.guile.devel:818 Han-Wen writes: > How is this supposed to portable to GenGC? > > SCM_DEFINE (scm_object_address, "object-address", 1, 0, 0, > (SCM obj), > "Return an integer that for the lifetime of @var{obj} is uniquely\n" > "returned by this function for @var{obj}") > > This is used in some of the goops code -- should I retain it? It would be cool if you could fake it. It doesn't need to be the real memory address of the object, just a unique integer. _______________________________________________ Guile-devel mailing list Guile-devel@gnu.org http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel