From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Rob Browning Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: GC rewrite, first version. Date: Sun, 28 Jul 2002 11:40:17 -0500 Sender: guile-devel-admin@gnu.org Message-ID: <871y9n3ixa.fsf@raven.i.defaultvalue.org> References: <15683.9371.859522.113833@blauw.xs4all.nl> NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1027874447 17766 127.0.0.1 (28 Jul 2002 16:40:47 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 28 Jul 2002 16:40:47 +0000 (UTC) Cc: guile-devel@gnu.org Return-path: Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 17Yr65-0004cR-00 for ; Sun, 28 Jul 2002 18:40:45 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 17Yr6P-0001te-00; Sun, 28 Jul 2002 12:41:05 -0400 Original-Received: from dsl-209-87-109-2.constant.com ([209.87.109.2] helo=defaultvalue.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 17Yr5e-0001rk-00 for ; Sun, 28 Jul 2002 12:40:18 -0400 Original-Received: from raven.i.defaultvalue.org (raven.i.defaultvalue.org [192.168.1.7]) by defaultvalue.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36BFF3D5E; Sun, 28 Jul 2002 11:40:18 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: by raven.i.defaultvalue.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 2DC311397; Sun, 28 Jul 2002 11:40:17 -0500 (CDT) Original-To: hanwen@cs.uu.nl In-Reply-To: <15683.9371.859522.113833@blauw.xs4all.nl> (Han-Wen's message of "Sun, 28 Jul 2002 00:54:19 +0200") Original-Lines: 23 User-Agent: Gnus/5.090006 (Oort Gnus v0.06) Emacs/21.2 (i386-pc-linux-gnu) Errors-To: guile-devel-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:870 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.guile.devel:870 Han-Wen writes: > * I've split gc.c in a lot of files, and a private header file. The > formerly static functions are now exported, but with the scm_ prefix > > I think the prefix scm_i_ is utterly unreadable. I decided against > using it. The header file is not `exported' so that should make it > clear that the structures are internal. I believe there was a discussion about this a while back, and although I'm fine with the idea of private headers (in fact, I tend to think that from the end-user's perspective they may be a bit cleaner), that wasn't the consensus. People preferred the scm_i_ approach. So while in general I'm not conceptually opposed to private headers instead of the scm_i_ prefix, I think whatever we do we should do it consistently. -- Rob Browning rlb @defaultvalue.org, @linuxdevel.com, and @debian.org Previously @cs.utexas.edu GPG=1C58 8B2C FB5E 3F64 EA5C 64AE 78FE E5FE F0CB A0AD _______________________________________________ Guile-devel mailing list Guile-devel@gnu.org http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel