From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Neil Jerram Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: [PATCH] Per-module reader, take #2 Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2005 21:41:48 +0100 Message-ID: <871x2j98qb.fsf@ossau.uklinux.net> References: <87u0gp9lm3.fsf@laas.fr> <877jd3lkdq.fsf@ossau.uklinux.net> <87hdc62a6c.fsf@laas.fr> <87irw49twc.fsf@laas.fr> <87irw3prgp.fsf@ossau.uklinux.net> <8764rw7b9q.fsf_-_@laas.fr> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1129581896 17669 80.91.229.2 (17 Oct 2005 20:44:56 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2005 20:44:56 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Oct 17 22:44:55 2005 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1ERbo7-0005se-HT for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 17 Oct 2005 22:42:07 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1ERbo6-0005mk-Sr for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 17 Oct 2005 16:42:06 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1ERbo2-0005mf-PI for guile-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Oct 2005 16:42:02 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1ERbo1-0005mT-8l for guile-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Oct 2005 16:42:02 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1ERbo1-0005mQ-6Z for guile-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Oct 2005 16:42:01 -0400 Original-Received: from [80.84.72.33] (helo=mail3.uklinux.net) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1ERbo1-0003Pj-Be for guile-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Oct 2005 16:42:01 -0400 Original-Received: from laruns (host81-139-127-30.in-addr.btopenworld.com [81.139.127.30]) by mail3.uklinux.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F72E409FE1 for ; Mon, 17 Oct 2005 20:41:58 +0000 (UTC) Original-Received: from laruns (laruns [127.0.0.1]) by laruns (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49DA56F718 for ; Mon, 17 Oct 2005 21:41:49 +0100 (BST) Original-To: guile-devel@gnu.org In-Reply-To: <8764rw7b9q.fsf_-_@laas.fr> ( =?iso-8859-1?q?Ludovic_Court=E8s's_message_of?= "Mon, 17 Oct 2005 11:17:37 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.1007 (Gnus v5.10.7) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:5305 Archived-At: ludovic.courtes@laas.fr (Ludovic Court=E8s) writes: > Following your concern (I mean the performance concern, not the > "marginal benefit" concern), I thought of another way to achieve the > same thing, a bit more generic and slightly better performance-wise > (patch attached). [...] Thanks for taking my considerations into account and producing this update. My gut feel is that I do like this new patch better, but I'd like to think about it more. I also need to go back and finish my draft reply to your previous email - I'll try to do that in the next day or so. Also, do you have docs for guile-reader up somewhere? Neil _______________________________________________ Guile-devel mailing list Guile-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel