From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Kevin Ryde Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: [PATCH] Per-module reader, take #2 Date: Sat, 29 Oct 2005 08:38:54 +1000 Message-ID: <871x258dxd.fsf@zip.com.au> References: <87u0gp9lm3.fsf@laas.fr> <877jd3lkdq.fsf@ossau.uklinux.net> <87hdc62a6c.fsf@laas.fr> <87irw49twc.fsf@laas.fr> <87irw3prgp.fsf@ossau.uklinux.net> <8764rw7b9q.fsf_-_@laas.fr> <871x2j98qb.fsf@ossau.uklinux.net> <87u0ffnudk.fsf@laas.fr> <87sluxb0xt.fsf@ossau.uklinux.net> <87r7agvdb1.fsf@laas.fr> <87wtk796xk.fsf@ossau.uklinux.net> <87br1jiacq.fsf@laas.fr> <87d5lp9vv4.fsf@ossau.uklinux.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1130539311 18194 80.91.229.2 (28 Oct 2005 22:41:51 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2005 22:41:51 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Oct 29 00:41:43 2005 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EVcsk-0007By-IF for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 29 Oct 2005 00:39:30 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EVcsk-0001em-AK for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 28 Oct 2005 18:39:30 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1EVcsU-0001Yj-AH for guile-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 28 Oct 2005 18:39:14 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1EVcsS-0001Xy-27 for guile-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 28 Oct 2005 18:39:13 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EVcsR-0001Xp-7u for guile-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 28 Oct 2005 18:39:11 -0400 Original-Received: from [61.8.0.84] (helo=mailout1.pacific.net.au) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1EVcsQ-0008Lp-Ie for guile-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 28 Oct 2005 18:39:11 -0400 Original-Received: from mailproxy2.pacific.net.au (mailproxy2.pacific.net.au [61.8.0.87]) by mailout1.pacific.net.au (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-3) with ESMTP id j9SMd02N001402 for ; Sat, 29 Oct 2005 08:39:00 +1000 Original-Received: from localhost (ppp25A6.dyn.pacific.net.au [61.8.37.166]) by mailproxy2.pacific.net.au (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-3) with ESMTP id j9SMcxV2029893 for ; Sat, 29 Oct 2005 08:38:59 +1000 Original-Received: from gg by localhost with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1EVcsA-0002Un-00; Sat, 29 Oct 2005 08:38:54 +1000 Original-To: guile-devel@gnu.org Mail-Copies-To: never In-Reply-To: <87d5lp9vv4.fsf@ossau.uklinux.net> (Neil Jerram's message of "Fri, 28 Oct 2005 22:26:07 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110004 (No Gnus v0.4) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:5365 Archived-At: Neil Jerram writes: > > Is binary compatibility a requirement? I presume this is aimed for > 1.8, and presumably for 1.8 we'd bump libguile's major version, > wouldn't we? (Getting into territory I don't really understand ...) Adding an arg to scm_primitive_load (if that's the question here), would be very bad, since that function is described in the manual. _______________________________________________ Guile-devel mailing list Guile-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel