From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Marius Vollmer Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: [PATCH] SRFI-34, SRFI-60 and core bindings Date: Wed, 07 Dec 2005 01:23:08 +0200 Message-ID: <871x0p4xpf.fsf@zagadka.de> References: <87zmp4mj1f.fsf@laas.fr> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1133911708 17949 80.91.229.2 (6 Dec 2005 23:28:28 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2005 23:28:28 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Dec 07 00:28:19 2005 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EjmC7-0007uX-Nn for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 07 Dec 2005 00:26:00 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EjmCJ-0000Yh-TW for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 06 Dec 2005 18:26:11 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Ejm9e-0005q3-Cp for guile-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 06 Dec 2005 18:23:28 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Ejm9c-0005nJ-BG for guile-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 06 Dec 2005 18:23:25 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Ejm9b-0005mv-TY for guile-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 06 Dec 2005 18:23:24 -0500 Original-Received: from [213.243.153.35] (helo=smtp2.pp.htv.fi) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1EjmAM-0008Vv-AU for guile-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 06 Dec 2005 18:24:10 -0500 Original-Received: from zagadka.ping.de (cs181072157.pp.htv.fi [82.181.72.157]) by smtp2.pp.htv.fi (Postfix) with SMTP id DDA5D296BB1 for ; Wed, 7 Dec 2005 01:23:08 +0200 (EET) Original-Received: (qmail 6431 invoked by uid 1000); 6 Dec 2005 23:23:08 -0000 Original-To: guile-devel@gnu.org In-Reply-To: <87zmp4mj1f.fsf@laas.fr> (Ludovic =?iso-8859-1?Q?Court=E8s's?= message of "Thu, 20 Oct 2005 15:09:48 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:5472 Archived-At: ludovic.courtes@laas.fr (Ludovic Court=E8s) writes: > * srfi/srfi-34.scm: Don't export `raise', replace it instead > (because `raise' otherwise overrides a code binding). These two 'raise' funtions are very different: one raises a Unix signal, the other raises an exception. So I'd say the warning is OK. > * srfi/srfi-60.scm: Don't export `bit-count', replace it > instead. The same is true for 'bit-count' as Kevin pointed out.=20 If you don't want to warning, you can define your own way of handling duplicates. See the NEWS file for docs about the options. --=20 GPG: D5D4E405 - 2F9B BCCC 8527 692A 04E3 331E FAF8 226A D5D4 E405 _______________________________________________ Guile-devel mailing list Guile-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel