unofficial mirror of guile-devel@gnu.org 
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: ludovic.courtes@laas.fr (Ludovic Courtès)
Cc: guile-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Re: 1.8 make check failing in popen.test
Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2006 09:25:38 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <871wsbcvm5.fsf@laas.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87k663c3vi.fsf@raven.defaultvalue.org> (Rob Browning's message of "Sun, 23 Jul 2006 16:12:33 -0700")

Hi,

Rob Browning <rlb@defaultvalue.org> writes:

> Kevin Ryde <user42@zip.com.au> writes:

>> I suppose you lose the aggregated tests counts at the end.  If all
>> tests work (which is presumably the normal case!) I guess it doesn't
>> matter much either way.
>
> I wonder if those test counts are actually all that useful.  I would
> guess that most of the time you only care whether there was an error
> or not.

Beside the test counts (which I find useful), running all the scripts in
a single process increases the chance of catching nasty bugs, as you
noticed.  ;-)  So I think it makes sense to keep it as is.

Thanks,
Ludovic.


_______________________________________________
Guile-devel mailing list
Guile-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel


  reply	other threads:[~2006-07-24  7:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-07-23  8:37 1.8 make check failing in popen.test Rob Browning
2006-07-23 22:36 ` Kevin Ryde
2006-07-23 23:12   ` Rob Browning
2006-07-24  7:25     ` Ludovic Courtès [this message]
2006-07-30  1:59       ` Rob Browning
2006-08-15  8:35 ` Rob Browning
2006-08-15 23:13   ` Kevin Ryde
2006-08-16  1:18     ` Rob Browning
2006-08-16 23:26       ` Kevin Ryde
2006-08-18  3:01         ` Rob Browning
2006-08-21 23:38           ` Kevin Ryde
2006-08-22  2:03             ` Rob Browning
2006-08-25  1:16               ` Kevin Ryde
2006-08-25  2:39                 ` Rob Browning
2006-08-27 20:06                   ` Rob Browning
2006-08-27 20:22                     ` Rob Browning
2006-08-30  7:50             ` Rob Browning
2006-08-31  0:24               ` Kevin Ryde
2006-08-31  6:28                 ` Rob Browning
2006-09-04  2:45                   ` Rob Browning
2006-09-07 20:46                     ` Kevin Ryde
2006-09-08  2:45                       ` Rob Browning
2006-09-08 23:05                         ` Kevin Ryde
2006-09-09 12:52                           ` Marius Vollmer
2006-09-09 16:39                             ` Rob Browning
2006-09-10 16:24                               ` Rob Browning
2006-09-11  1:16                                 ` Rob Browning
2006-09-11  6:40                                   ` Neil Jerram
2006-09-11 15:57                                     ` Rob Browning
2006-09-11 17:40                                       ` Neil Jerram

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/guile/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=871wsbcvm5.fsf@laas.fr \
    --to=ludovic.courtes@laas.fr \
    --cc=guile-devel@gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).