unofficial mirror of guile-devel@gnu.org 
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: ludo@chbouib.org (Ludovic Courtès)
Subject: Re: Eval options macro: backward compatibility?
Date: Sat, 20 Jan 2007 15:35:18 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <871wlprck9.fsf@chbouib.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: eoqnqp$ki1$1@sea.gmane.org

Hi,

Han-Wen Nienhuys <hanwen@xs4all.nl> writes:

> this order is awkward when a new trap option has to be added.
>
> The problematic thing is that this is exported to GUILE users, through
>
>   #define SCM_ENTER_FRAME_P      scm_evaluator_trap_table[1].val
>
> in eval.h
>
> I would like to change this order, and if possible move this out of
> the global namespace.  Are there any objections?

It's ok for 1.9 to break binary compatibility, and it's also probably a
good thing to not export things that are not documented.  So I think
SCM_EVALUATOR_TRAP_TABLE could either be made `static' or renamed to
SCM_I_..., and `SCM_ENTER_FRAME_P' could certainly be moved in `eval.c'
if it's not needed elsewhere.

Thanks,
Ludovic.



_______________________________________________
Guile-devel mailing list
Guile-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel


  reply	other threads:[~2007-01-20 14:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-01-19 15:24 Eval options macro: backward compatibility? Han-Wen Nienhuys
2007-01-20 14:35 ` Ludovic Courtès [this message]
2007-01-22 14:18   ` Han-Wen Nienhuys
2007-01-22 20:48     ` Kevin Ryde
2007-01-23  0:51       ` deprecated features Han-Wen Nienhuys
2007-01-23  1:03         ` Kevin Ryde
2007-01-23  1:20           ` Han-Wen Nienhuys
2007-01-23 14:50             ` Bruce Korb
2007-01-23 22:45               ` Han-Wen Nienhuys
2007-01-23 23:20                 ` Bruce Korb
2007-01-24  0:44                   ` Han-Wen Nienhuys
2007-01-24  0:10                     ` Bruce Korb
2007-01-23 23:10               ` Han-Wen Nienhuys
2007-01-23 23:35                 ` Bruce Korb
2007-01-24  0:38                   ` Han-Wen Nienhuys
2007-01-24 22:44             ` Kevin Ryde
2007-01-22 15:28   ` Eval options macro: backward compatibility? Han-Wen Nienhuys
2007-01-22 20:50   ` Kevin Ryde
2007-01-24 21:05 ` Kevin Ryde

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/guile/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=871wlprck9.fsf@chbouib.org \
    --to=ludo@chbouib.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).