From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?iso-8859-1?Q?Court=E8s?=) Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix hanging of popen.test Date: Sun, 04 Jul 2010 00:17:36 +0200 Message-ID: <871vbkqkfz.fsf@gnu.org> References: <1276210496-6477-1-git-send-email-neil@ossau.uklinux.net> <87vd9p5p07.fsf@ossau.uklinux.net> <871vbq25if.fsf@ossau.uklinux.net> <87d3v9irhy.fsf@ossau.uklinux.net> <87sk442l0n.fsf@ossau.uklinux.net> <87bpasvzra.fsf@ossau.uklinux.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1278195486 2008 80.91.229.12 (3 Jul 2010 22:18:06 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 3 Jul 2010 22:18:06 +0000 (UTC) To: guile-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Jul 04 00:18:05 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OVB2B-0001iG-Lo for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 04 Jul 2010 00:18:04 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35848 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OVB2B-0007gy-3F for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 03 Jul 2010 18:18:03 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=42067 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OVB24-0007gt-Af for guile-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 03 Jul 2010 18:17:57 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OVB22-0007Ws-Os for guile-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 03 Jul 2010 18:17:56 -0400 Original-Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]:56497) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OVB22-0007WV-Jf for guile-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 03 Jul 2010 18:17:54 -0400 Original-Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OVB1x-0001fw-OE for guile-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 04 Jul 2010 00:17:49 +0200 Original-Received: from acces.bordeaux.inria.fr ([193.50.110.5]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 04 Jul 2010 00:17:49 +0200 Original-Received: from ludo by acces.bordeaux.inria.fr with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 04 Jul 2010 00:17:49 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 23 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: acces.bordeaux.inria.fr X-URL: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ X-Revolutionary-Date: 16 Messidor an 218 de la =?iso-8859-1?Q?R=E9volution?= X-PGP-Key-ID: 0xEA52ECF4 X-PGP-Key: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ludovic.asc X-PGP-Fingerprint: 83C4 F8E5 10A3 3B4C 5BEA D15D 77DD 95E2 EA52 ECF4 X-OS: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:UpekCJtWz9hb1JP071qpE1Lf08E= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:10608 Archived-At: Hello, Andy Wingo writes: >> It occurred to me that if this is right, the Hydra build should be >> failing too. And I think it is. The "gnu:guile-master:tarball" build >> last succeeded on 17th June, and has been failing since then: >> http://hydra.nixos.org/job/gnu/guile-master/tarball/all?page=1 > > This has been an on-and-off issue: > 02fcbf78b27788c03563e5c3d297a4cd469ce562, and > 04af4c4c5221c082905d52eb5ad3829ed681d097. Indeed running the repl before > srfi-1 is built should not work. As a corollary, the docstring texi > thing should not require srfi-1 to work, which obviously is failing for > you and hydra, though not for me and a number of other people. I don't > really get it. I thought this was fixed. There have been a couple > threads about this, even, if you search the archives in recent months. Though that’s not the proper fix, I propose to rewrite the SRFI-1 bits that are in C to Scheme. I’ll look into it if nobody beats me at it. Thanks, Ludo’.