From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andreas Rottmann Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add implementation of SRFI 27 Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2010 00:37:52 +0200 Message-ID: <871v8a503j.fsf@delenn.lan> References: <87bp7sm891.fsf@delenn.lan> <877hi5q0qg.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1285886311 1779 80.91.229.12 (30 Sep 2010 22:38:31 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2010 22:38:31 +0000 (UTC) Cc: guile-devel@gnu.org To: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Oct 01 00:38:28 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1P1Rlh-0008To-At for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 01 Oct 2010 00:38:26 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50235 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1P1Rle-0003mO-FK for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 30 Sep 2010 18:38:22 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=54228 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1P1RlV-0003mC-Ka for guile-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 30 Sep 2010 18:38:20 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1P1RlM-0008Nn-Dx for guile-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 30 Sep 2010 18:38:13 -0400 Original-Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net ([213.165.64.22]:44077 helo=mail.gmx.net) by eggs.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1P1RlM-0008NE-2y for guile-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 30 Sep 2010 18:38:04 -0400 Original-Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 30 Sep 2010 22:38:00 -0000 Original-Received: from 83-215-154-5.hage.dyn.salzburg-online.at (EHLO nathot.lan) [83.215.154.5] by mail.gmx.net (mp030) with SMTP; 01 Oct 2010 00:38:00 +0200 X-Authenticated: #3102804 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1+SFM4zxz+SgCEkjvziWSCFo/8bEX4/CgRSuefanq PBy4B6u/3RZ8Uc Original-Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by nathot.lan (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDA473A6BC; Fri, 1 Oct 2010 00:37:59 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from nathot.lan ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (nathot.lan [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9+7qCFJfZ4Pt; Fri, 1 Oct 2010 00:37:53 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from delenn.lan (delenn.lan [192.168.3.11]) by nathot.lan (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02B753A6B9; Fri, 1 Oct 2010 00:37:52 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: by delenn.lan (Postfix, from userid 1000) id B53E074E1B; Fri, 1 Oct 2010 00:37:52 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: <877hi5q0qg.fsf@gnu.org> ("Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s=22'?= =?utf-8?Q?s?= message of "Tue, 28 Sep 2010 18:41:43 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux) X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:10971 Archived-At: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Court=C3=A8s) writes: > Andreas Rottmann writes: > >> +@c This subsection is based on the specification of SRFI-27, which has >> +@c the following license: >> + >> +@c Copyright (C) Sebastian Egner (2002). All Rights Reserved. > > Perhaps this should appear in the text, perhaps with a link to the > license or something? > Indeed, I will put something along these lines into the text, including a link to the original specification (which includes the license text at its end). Expect a patch sometime soon. A slightly related question: I'm preparing patches to add SRFI 42 and 67. I don't know if I'll find the time and motivation to also provide a texinfo version of their specifications (and, contrary to SRFI 27, these would essentially be literal transcriptions). Would patches which just add links to the documents at http://srfi.schemers.org/ into the manual at the appropriate places be acceptable as well? Regards, Rotty --=20 Andreas Rottmann --