From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Mark H Weaver <mhw@netris.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel
Subject: uc_tolower (uc_toupper (x))
Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2011 18:39:58 -0500
Message-ID: <871v2esfxt.fsf@netris.org>
NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1299800456 2733 80.91.229.12 (10 Mar 2011 23:40:56 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2011 23:40:56 +0000 (UTC)
To: guile-devel@gnu.org
Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Mar 11 00:40:52 2011
Return-path: <guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>)
	id 1PxpTP-0001Rx-97
	for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 11 Mar 2011 00:40:51 +0100
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54590 helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1PxpTO-0000Hm-7q
	for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 10 Mar 2011 18:40:50 -0500
Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=53325 helo=eggs.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PxpT1-00006q-OJ
	for guile-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 10 Mar 2011 18:40:28 -0500
Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mhw@netris.org>) id 1PxpSz-0002ny-IC
	for guile-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 10 Mar 2011 18:40:26 -0500
Original-Received: from world.peace.net ([216.204.32.208]:52012)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mhw@netris.org>) id 1PxpSz-0002mD-Ep
	for guile-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 10 Mar 2011 18:40:25 -0500
Original-Received: from 209-6-39-128.c3-0.smr-ubr1.sbo-smr.ma.cable.rcn.com
	([209.6.39.128] helo=freedomincluded)
	by world.peace.net with esmtpa (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <mhw@netris.org>)
	id 1PxpSk-0007sz-37; Thu, 10 Mar 2011 18:40:10 -0500
Original-Received: from mhw by freedomincluded with local (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <mhw@netris.org>)
	id 1PxpSY-0007nF-Uw; Thu, 10 Mar 2011 18:39:58 -0500
X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3)
X-Received-From: 216.204.32.208
X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Developers list for Guile,
	the GNU extensibility library" <guile-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel>,
	<mailto:guile-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guile-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:guile-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guile-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel>,
	<mailto:guile-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:11849
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.guile.devel/11849>

I've noticed that srfi-13.c very frequently does:

  uc_tolower (uc_toupper (x))

Is there a good reason to do this instead of:

  uc_tolower (x)

?

     Mark