From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?iso-8859-1?Q?Court=E8s?=) Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: gnu in summer-of-code: more projects needed Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2011 17:56:13 +0200 Message-ID: <871v1err6q.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87tyee79at.fsf@olor.terpri.org> <877hb9g1d9.fsf@gnu.org> <87fwpv6po5.fsf@olor.terpri.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1302192071 10352 80.91.229.12 (7 Apr 2011 16:01:11 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2011 16:01:11 +0000 (UTC) To: guile-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Apr 07 18:01:07 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Q7rdp-00049J-5m for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 07 Apr 2011 18:01:05 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38209 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Q7rZu-0007Eg-H1 for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 07 Apr 2011 11:57:02 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=45666 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Q7rZg-00076Z-O9 for guile-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Apr 2011 11:56:50 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Q7rZT-0008WA-WB for guile-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Apr 2011 11:56:36 -0400 Original-Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]:48535) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Q7rZT-0008W6-Qb for guile-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Apr 2011 11:56:35 -0400 Original-Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Q7rZR-0008TL-TM for guile-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Apr 2011 17:56:33 +0200 Original-Received: from 193.50.110.208 ([193.50.110.208]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 07 Apr 2011 17:56:33 +0200 Original-Received: from ludo by 193.50.110.208 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 07 Apr 2011 17:56:33 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 40 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 193.50.110.208 X-URL: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ X-Revolutionary-Date: 18 Germinal an 219 de la =?iso-8859-1?Q?R=E9volution?= X-PGP-Key-ID: 0xEA52ECF4 X-PGP-Key: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ludovic.asc X-PGP-Fingerprint: 83C4 F8E5 10A3 3B4C 5BEA D15D 77DD 95E2 EA52 ECF4 X-OS: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu User-Agent: Gnus/5.110015 (No Gnus v0.15) Emacs/23.3 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:Nj5Jhb2/h7ZlVorsFF9kYWw39so= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 80.91.229.12 X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:12189 Archived-At: Hello! BT Templeton writes: > ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes: > >> BT Templeton writes: [...] >>> * Implement Emacs-compatible lexical binding support >> >> In what way is the current elisp implementation in Guile not >> Emacs-compatible? > > This is a trivial change; Emacs uses the `lexical-binding' variable to > determine the default scope rules on a per-file basis, while Guile-Elisp > provides a `lexical-let' special form. OK. BTW, it appears that the Emacs ‘lexbind’ branch has been merged: . > I think a logical next step would be to update Ken Raeburn's Guilemacs > patches to work with Emacs 24 and Guile 2.0, perhaps in parallel with > the above tasks. I'll include that in my proposal Cool. I guess you’d have to define priorities, because all this can be a lot of work. >> If the latter, would you be around after the summer to work on Emacs >> integration? :-) > > Yes. Great. :-) Ĝis, Ludo’.