From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andy Wingo Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: bug#10522: Patch: Improve optional variable and keyword notation in manual Date: Sun, 03 Mar 2013 10:45:36 +0100 Message-ID: <871ubwg6kf.fsf@pobox.com> References: <87d3ajh1lt.fsf@goof.localdomain> <87obtgjbag.fsf@pobox.com> <876219egqv.fsf@pobox.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1362303946 19623 80.91.229.3 (3 Mar 2013 09:45:46 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 3 Mar 2013 09:45:46 +0000 (UTC) Cc: guile-devel , 10522@debbugs.gnu.org To: Daniel Hartwig Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Mar 03 10:46:09 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1UC5Ue-0004uW-0h for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 03 Mar 2013 10:46:08 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:54332 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UC5UI-0004as-PE for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 03 Mar 2013 04:45:46 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:53039) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UC5UD-0004ad-QM for guile-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 03 Mar 2013 04:45:42 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UC5UC-0000mA-Gz for guile-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 03 Mar 2013 04:45:41 -0500 Original-Received: from a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com ([208.72.237.25]:48384 helo=sasl.smtp.pobox.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UC5UC-0000lp-D8 for guile-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 03 Mar 2013 04:45:40 -0500 Original-Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C1FECC24; Sun, 3 Mar 2013 04:45:39 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=xDL01ln+h4qNbjdnOceROEIG7Ug=; b=jkskla hNHYScOlM3a/Q1cs9jkyPrL31pDjgrc3YQ9b6b4Gi/RsazFtzfRKvllALcmnAgx3 NpwegasOdpCqOCTIqvDfNUlmOtnmB922cWMsapQLZ1H80PAEP9GHRsssB3MXvloK WAtW6Zvfe3bbppAlFNfsrkbSdYkiVdgeLVB3U= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=W78pAVC6yCuQ0SGuzlYniyqh0SK/kcLc tSqhTw4WDpeks4yi7EwGzILPxSHT+IyJS0+68YexytV27PSSPQrtssobsj/NFShZ wZ5QgppFCeL/xOPO5dWlvVE35IFHda3E/GZiMNobCuV0AbB7P/MtSEpLz17IZ551 Vh0X/n1Qwgk= Original-Received: from a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65487CC23; Sun, 3 Mar 2013 04:45:39 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from badger (unknown [88.160.190.192]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id EF910CC22; Sun, 3 Mar 2013 04:45:38 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: (Daniel Hartwig's message of "Sun, 3 Mar 2013 09:07:24 +0800") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.2 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 1B2B8904-83E7-11E2-84F6-034D0E5B5709-02397024!a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 X-Received-From: 208.72.237.25 X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:15856 Archived-At: On Sun 03 Mar 2013 02:07, Daniel Hartwig writes: > Can I ask whether it is preferred to use, e.g. @code{#f}, for the > default values, as some places seem to and others don't. This patch > is not using @code, but then, neither does it touch any doc. that was > previously. Good question. Do you have an opinion?