From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Rob Browning Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: Debian package build problems with 2.0.9 (from git) Date: Sat, 15 Jun 2013 23:52:55 -0500 Message-ID: <871u82sllk.fsf@trouble.defaultvalue.org> References: <87ip1fuu30.fsf@trouble.defaultvalue.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1371358385 14216 80.91.229.3 (16 Jun 2013 04:53:05 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 16 Jun 2013 04:53:05 +0000 (UTC) Cc: guile-devel@gnu.org To: Daniel Hartwig Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Jun 16 06:53:05 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Uo4xc-0000Wd-8g for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 16 Jun 2013 06:53:04 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:36792 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Uo4xb-0005xX-VB for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 16 Jun 2013 00:53:03 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:41604) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Uo4xX-0005xA-44 for guile-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 16 Jun 2013 00:53:00 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Uo4xW-0007F2-8H for guile-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 16 Jun 2013 00:52:59 -0400 Original-Received: from defaultvalue.org ([70.85.129.156]:50810) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Uo4xW-0007Es-4B for guile-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 16 Jun 2013 00:52:58 -0400 Original-Received: from trouble.defaultvalue.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (Authenticated sender: rlb@defaultvalue.org) by defaultvalue.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C11DD90D24; Sat, 15 Jun 2013 23:52:55 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: by trouble.defaultvalue.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 5338314E064; Sat, 15 Jun 2013 23:52:55 -0500 (CDT) In-Reply-To: (Daniel Hartwig's message of "Sun, 16 Jun 2013 08:22:57 +0800") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 70.85.129.156 X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:16489 Archived-At: Daniel Hartwig writes: > Not really related to your build failure, but now that the docs do not > need to be separated I really think you should use the upstream > tarball for packaging. I may eventually, but if I do, I can't nearly as easily cherry-pick patches, or update to a new release. It's quite handy to be able to use normal git commands with respect to upstream development. (And for anyone remotely interested -- I use git-dpm -- many thanks to Bernhard.) Thanks -- Rob Browning rlb @defaultvalue.org and @debian.org GPG as of 2011-07-10 E6A9 DA3C C9FD 1FF8 C676 D2C4 C0F0 39E9 ED1B 597A GPG as of 2002-11-03 14DD 432F AE39 534D B592 F9A0 25C8 D377 8C7E 73A4