From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Max Techter Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: Around again, and docs lead role Date: 13 May 2003 16:14:38 +0200 Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Message-ID: <86znlr9bn5.fsf@520000401788.dialin.t-online.de> References: <86r874ru3i.fsf@520000401788.dialin.t-online.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1052835596 8710 80.91.224.249 (13 May 2003 14:19:56 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 13 May 2003 14:19:56 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Guile Development Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue May 13 16:19:53 2003 Return-path: Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 19Faau-00023A-00 for ; Tue, 13 May 2003 16:17:28 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10.13) id 19Fabs-00052w-07 for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 13 May 2003 10:18:28 -0400 Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.10.13) id 19FabY-00052I-00 for guile-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 13 May 2003 10:18:08 -0400 Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.10.13) id 19FaZI-0004fV-00 for guile-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 13 May 2003 10:15:51 -0400 Original-Received: from pop.gmx.de ([213.165.65.60] helo=mail.gmx.net) by monty-python.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.10.13) id 19FaVe-0003N8-00 for guile-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 13 May 2003 10:12:02 -0400 Original-Received: (qmail 7198 invoked by uid 65534); 13 May 2003 14:11:44 -0000 Original-Received: from pD9E77EA3.dip.t-dialin.net (EHLO 520000401788.dialin.t-online.de) (217.231.126.163) by mail.gmx.net (mp007-rz3) with SMTP; 13 May 2003 16:11:44 +0200 Original-Received: from max by 520000401788.dialin.t-online.de with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 19FaYA-0000dr-00; Tue, 13 May 2003 16:14:38 +0200 Original-To: Neil Jerram In-Reply-To: Original-Lines: 71 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2 X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1b5 Precedence: list List-Id: Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe: , Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:2351 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.guile.devel:2351 Neil Jerram writes: > >>>>> "Max" == Max Techter writes: > > Max> Neil Jerram writes: > Max> snip > >> snip > Max> I am new to guile, new to this list > > Max> (though I posted a couple of replies concerning the overall > Max> structure, and the principle need of tutorials) > > First off, apologies for not replying to your earlier detailed email > yet - I'm a bit busy and taking time to digest it, but it looks like > just the kind of high-level input that I was hoping someone would > supply. snip Take your time, Neil. I will be engaged in "my guile analysis" for quite some time. And there is no chance for me coming up with first well formed proposals before, say the end of this month, although I`ll try to supply my comments sooner. > Max> If you think, that in the current state of discussion, this > Max> kind of critique could be useful, tell me: > > Yes, absolutely! > > Max> hacking revised comments into, say the .texi > Max> source, would not put a too heavy workload on me. > snip On which version exactly should I build? I produced my printout and info files from: @set MANUAL_EDITION 1.0 ... ... @title Guile Reference Manual @subtitle Edition @value{MANUAL_EDITION}, \ for use with Guile @value{VERSION} # this evaluated to 1.6.2 @subtitle $Id: guile.texi,v 1.2.2.17 2002/09/25 00:12:21 ossau Exp $ Is this OK, or should I switch to a source from CVS? > If you have any suggestions for a overall plan of > how to rectify the problems that you've noted, > I would love to hear > them too. > Taking the fun of playing the harsh critic, I would feel obliged to propose better ways, naturally. regards max. _______________________________________________ Guile-devel mailing list Guile-devel@gnu.org http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel