From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?iso-8859-1?Q?Court=E8s?=) Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: GNU Guile 1.9.0 released (alpha) Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2009 16:00:33 +0200 Message-ID: <86skhtvg8u.fsf@gnu.org> References: <86y6rnev6m.fsf@gnu.org> <3ae3aa420906192000h57399eaayc7a642c9f97f1a98@mail.gmail.com> <3ae3aa420906201117g7db10ce3h9aecc18269060d6b@mail.gmail.com> <119243.89652.qm@web37903.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <8663epwuw2.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1245593121 28094 80.91.229.12 (21 Jun 2009 14:05:21 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2009 14:05:21 +0000 (UTC) To: guile-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Jun 21 16:05:17 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1MINfZ-0004hg-0T for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 21 Jun 2009 16:05:17 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44570 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MINfY-0004Uj-9q for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 21 Jun 2009 10:05:16 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MINfW-0004TM-9q for guile-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 21 Jun 2009 10:05:14 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MINfR-0004N4-Qi for guile-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 21 Jun 2009 10:05:14 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=54637 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MINfR-0004N1-Oc for guile-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 21 Jun 2009 10:05:09 -0400 Original-Received: from main.gmane.org ([80.91.229.2]:60031 helo=ciao.gmane.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MINfR-0003Rc-1L for guile-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 21 Jun 2009 10:05:09 -0400 Original-Received: from root by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1MINfK-0005JT-CK for guile-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 21 Jun 2009 14:05:02 +0000 Original-Received: from reverse-83.fdn.fr ([80.67.176.83]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 21 Jun 2009 14:05:02 +0000 Original-Received: from ludo by reverse-83.fdn.fr with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 21 Jun 2009 14:05:02 +0000 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 25 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: reverse-83.fdn.fr X-URL: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ X-Revolutionary-Date: 3 Messidor an 217 de la =?iso-8859-1?Q?R=E9volution?= X-PGP-Key-ID: 0xEA52ECF4 X-PGP-Key: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ludovic.asc X-PGP-Fingerprint: 821D 815D 902A 7EAB 5CEE D120 7FBA 3D4F EB1F 5364 X-OS: i486-pc-linux-gnu User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.91 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:6XidSKH0DjLkVADHRhnEwGDlgXI= X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:8744 Archived-At: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes: > Mike Gran writes: > >> --- a/libguile/r6rs-ports.c >> +++ b/libguile/r6rs-ports.c >> @@ -210,7 +210,10 @@ static SCM >> cbp_mark (SCM port) >> { >> /* Mark the underlying method and object vector. */ >> - return SCM_PACK (SCM_STREAM (port)); >> + if (SCM_PTAB_ENTRY (port) != NULL) >> + return SCM_PACK (SCM_STREAM (port)); >> + else >> + return SCM_BOOL_F; >> } > > Hmm, how can we have "SCM_PTAB_ENTRY (port) == NULL" at this point? Of course I read Neil's commit right after: the answer is "if PORT is closed." Thanks for finding it out! Ludo'.