unofficial mirror of guile-devel@gnu.org 
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Max Techter <mtechter@gmx.de>
Cc: Guile Development <guile-devel@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: Around again, and docs lead role
Date: 12 May 2003 18:46:25 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <86r874ru3i.fsf@520000401788.dialin.t-online.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <m3llxxd873.fsf@laruns.ossau.uklinux.net>

Neil Jerram <neil@ossau.uklinux.net> writes:

snip
> 
> That said... is there anyone out there who'd be interested in taking
> over the lead role on Guile documentation?
> 
> I have three reasons for asking this:
> 
> - I don't expect to have a _lot_ of time for Guile soon, and the docs
>   would benefit from someone with more time available.
> 
> - I have other Guile interests that I'd like to spend some of that
>   time on.
> 
> - A new pair of eyes could take a fresh look at the higher-level doc
>   issues such as overall organization, what kind of docs we need
>   (e.g. the cookbook idea) etc.
> 
> Any takers?
> 
        
Hi, 

I am new to guile, new to this list 

(though I posted a couple of replies concerning the overall
structure, and the principle need of tutorials)

I am not ready to offer to take the lead role on Guile
documentation, but I offer to `throw in my two cent' as
Thamer put it in a subsequent posting in this thread.


Last weekend I managed to spare an evening for diving deeper
into the

        `Guile Reference Manual',  
        Edition 1.0, for use with Guile 1.6.2 

The first impression I had was verified:

        A prototype of a documentation. 

        Lacking an understandable high level structure.

        Inconsistent in things that should be common 
          (Eg. sometimes the aim and the audience of the section
           is mentioned, sometimes not) 

        Inconsistent in things that should vary 
          (Eg. different sections, chapters, parts freely
          mix the level of the examples supplied) 
        



Right now I am adding up pall pen remarks to my printed
version, these would normally go down the shredder, after I
managed to extract my private documentation map.


If you think, that in the current state of discussion, this
kind of critique could be useful, tell me:

        hacking revised comments into, say  the .texi
        source, would not put a too heavy workload on me.

regards 
max.


_______________________________________________
Guile-devel mailing list
Guile-devel@gnu.org
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel


  parent reply	other threads:[~2003-05-12 16:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-04-26  7:33 Around again, and docs lead role Neil Jerram
2003-04-26 10:19 ` Thamer Al-Harbash
2003-04-27 20:56   ` Neil Jerram
     [not found]   ` <3E92E1B40021F4D7@pop3.tiscalinet.es>
2003-04-27 21:01     ` Neil Jerram
     [not found]       ` <3E92E1B4002B0632@pop3.tiscalinet.es>
2003-04-30 22:47         ` Neil Jerram
     [not found]           ` <3EAFE4EC000D9733@pop1.tiscalinet.es>
2003-05-07 21:06             ` Doc organization (Re: Around again, and docs lead role) Neil Jerram
2003-05-08 16:21               ` Rob Browning
2003-05-08 17:50                 ` rm
2003-05-08 22:47                   ` Neil Jerram
2003-05-08 21:18                 ` Wolfgang Jaehrling
2003-05-08 22:36                 ` Neil Jerram
2003-05-09  2:23                   ` Rob Browning
2003-05-09 17:46                     ` David Van Horn
2003-05-10 11:32                     ` Neil Jerram
2003-05-15 16:02                       ` Rob Browning
2003-05-15 16:33                         ` Paul Jarc
2003-05-08 16:21               ` Max Techter
     [not found]                 ` <3EB9828B00021495@pop1.tiscalinet.es>
2003-05-08 21:12                   ` Max Techter
2003-05-27  2:02                     ` Max Techter
2003-05-08 22:57                 ` Neil Jerram
2003-05-09 12:32                   ` Max Techter
2003-05-09  8:15               ` tomas
2003-05-10 12:01                 ` Neil Jerram
2003-05-12 11:40                   ` tomas
2003-05-12 16:46 ` Max Techter [this message]
2003-05-12 20:25   ` Around again, and docs lead role Neil Jerram
2003-05-13 14:14     ` Max Techter
2003-05-13 19:56       ` Neil Jerram

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/guile/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=86r874ru3i.fsf@520000401788.dialin.t-online.de \
    --to=mtechter@gmx.de \
    --cc=guile-devel@gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).