From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?iso-8859-1?Q?Court=E8s?=) Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: release update Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 23:01:58 +0200 Message-ID: <86iqitw915.fsf@gnu.org> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1245359839 16352 80.91.229.12 (18 Jun 2009 21:17:19 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 21:17:19 +0000 (UTC) To: guile-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Jun 18 23:17:16 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1MHOyw-00063L-HM for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 18 Jun 2009 23:17:15 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43232 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MHOyv-0001Fq-Pd for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 18 Jun 2009 17:17:13 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MHOmc-00012N-9s for guile-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 18 Jun 2009 17:04:30 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MHOmX-0000zT-03 for guile-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 18 Jun 2009 17:04:29 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=47704 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MHOmW-0000zH-Hu for guile-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 18 Jun 2009 17:04:24 -0400 Original-Received: from main.gmane.org ([80.91.229.2]:49685 helo=ciao.gmane.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MHOmV-00012v-TV for guile-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 18 Jun 2009 17:04:24 -0400 Original-Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1MHOmT-0000Qz-5v for guile-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 18 Jun 2009 21:04:21 +0000 Original-Received: from reverse-83.fdn.fr ([80.67.176.83]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 18 Jun 2009 21:04:21 +0000 Original-Received: from ludo by reverse-83.fdn.fr with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 18 Jun 2009 21:04:21 +0000 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 40 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: reverse-83.fdn.fr X-URL: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ X-Revolutionary-Date: 30 Prairial an 217 de la =?iso-8859-1?Q?R=E9volution?= X-PGP-Key-ID: 0xEA52ECF4 X-PGP-Key: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ludovic.asc X-PGP-Fingerprint: 821D 815D 902A 7EAB 5CEE D120 7FBA 3D4F EB1F 5364 X-OS: i486-pc-linux-gnu User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.91 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:JDCltpKsZjnert1ibLve7sHJkzE= X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:8704 Archived-At: Andy Wingo writes: > One question is that I've been calling this thing 1.9.1 under the > assumption that we made a 1.9.0; but that does not seem to be the case. > Should this one be 1.9.0 or 1.9.1? I'd say 1.9.0. > guile-config and pkg-config We should deprecate the former, BTW, if this hasn't already been done. > (system xref), procedure-callers, procedure-callees, can work as > variables get redefined I think this should be added to the manual as well. > BUG: SCM_SNAME -> SCM_SUBR_NAME Ooh, I didn't worry much about it back then. Should we? > FIXME: update copyrights Yes. (There's "(add-hook 'write-file-hooks 'copyright-update)", which I find convenient.) > ecmascript support? Yes, although it's currently undocumented. > new function: scm_module_public_interface Speaking of which, I was thinking at some point about adding a `public-interface' slot to `module-type', to avoid hash table lookups. What do you think? Thanks, Ludo'.