From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: pukkamustard Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: Functional datatypes in Guile Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2023 05:15:25 +0000 Message-ID: <867cs4c7b9.fsf@posteo.net> References: <2682583.mvXUDI8C0e@t480s> <86bklenq75.fsf@posteo.net> <87edmjs1q8.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="1619"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: guile-devel@gnu.org To: Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Jun 16 07:20:42 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1qA1t4-0000Hu-8Y for guile-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 16 Jun 2023 07:20:42 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qA1sf-0002xz-9A; Fri, 16 Jun 2023 01:20:18 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qA1sQ-0002vk-Gt for guile-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 16 Jun 2023 01:20:03 -0400 Original-Received: from mout02.posteo.de ([185.67.36.66]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qA1sN-0007Ro-7K for guile-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 16 Jun 2023 01:20:01 -0400 Original-Received: from submission (posteo.de [185.67.36.169]) by mout02.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 292E9240101 for ; Fri, 16 Jun 2023 07:19:56 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.net; s=2017; t=1686892796; bh=JcBl84AcxbvaeUIbZ49C5IAsh7SQmX8C1eYjpdtSuIU=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version: Content-Transfer-Encoding:From; b=ROsq0UNLbJaKrb2Fm+Ul6a/SQi+8bCEBU1KXlcDjfKW/A82/gobtkvYIegfjkadh9 xUgUGw8JPkg9wf/tt7wNIiVYaXlgtRrlkNK2m+kH7NAdOUUy2/JlAXEop0XUdoOkLa G3O43Ht03NNn9B944odf9655tOvS8alvIoG3F17ZGwlYqX+Xd7xYtxSRxFWwZnSPyq LOdg1etaReqqdUvOTYIBT3zo3Wh+WsVCZB0XriIYAvKZtu6F+cfRB/pHocLmS1PF2F IS1M8H//BI51XRe2VmB6a5ds7ijmD0gsMdk6h5gnYmMjZo6fInDJmP8hvzUGSMwue4 nveOziLV0mg+Q== Original-Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 4Qj6t335LMz6tsg; Fri, 16 Jun 2023 07:19:55 +0200 (CEST) In-reply-to: <87edmjs1q8.fsf@gnu.org> Received-SPF: pass client-ip=185.67.36.66; envelope-from=pukkamustard@posteo.net; helo=mout02.posteo.de X-Spam_score_int: -43 X-Spam_score: -4.4 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.4 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H5=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.lisp.guile.devel:21863 Archived-At: Ludovic Court=C3=A8s writes: > Hello, > > pukkamustard skribis: > >> I've been using SRFI-146 >> (https://srfi.schemers.org/srfi-146/srfi-146.html) for functional >> mappings. There's a Guile port: >> https://inqlab.net/git/guile-srfi-146.git/ (also in Guix - >> guile-srfi-146). > > I=E2=80=99m late to the party, but I think it=E2=80=99d be nice to integr= ate this in > Guile proper, and possibly other implementations like fash/fector. > > These data structures are crucial and the code is very much =E2=80=9Cwrite > once=E2=80=9D, so cheap in terms of maintenance, so I=E2=80=99m all for g= etting them in > Guile. > > WDYT? I'm all for including SRFI-146 in Guile proper! If nobody else is up for it, I'll try and prepare some patches. -pukkamustard