From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: Guile's DATAROOTDIR and DATADIR Date: Sat, 16 Jul 2016 13:29:21 +0300 Message-ID: <83oa5x6flq.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83furb6zs7.fsf@gnu.org> <87shvavmn9.fsf@netris.org> <834m7q7q1x.fsf@gnu.org> <87h9bqugcj.fsf@netris.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1468664982 18317 80.91.229.3 (16 Jul 2016 10:29:42 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 16 Jul 2016 10:29:42 +0000 (UTC) Cc: guile-devel@gnu.org To: Mark H Weaver Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Jul 16 12:29:42 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1bOMqq-0004Tw-1m for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 16 Jul 2016 12:29:40 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:36775 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bOMqp-0004qb-48 for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 16 Jul 2016 06:29:39 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:45265) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bOMql-0004qV-8h for guile-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 16 Jul 2016 06:29:36 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bOMqg-0003xQ-FZ for guile-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 16 Jul 2016 06:29:35 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:50140) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bOMqg-0003xK-CB; Sat, 16 Jul 2016 06:29:30 -0400 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:4582 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1bOMqf-0007qp-3c; Sat, 16 Jul 2016 06:29:29 -0400 In-reply-to: <87h9bqugcj.fsf@netris.org> (message from Mark H Weaver on Sat, 16 Jul 2016 04:39:24 -0400) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "guile-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:18534 Archived-At: > From: Mark H Weaver > Cc: guile-devel@gnu.org > Date: Sat, 16 Jul 2016 04:39:24 -0400 > > > It make sense if it indeed works in practice. > > As I wrote in my previous message, it does indeed seem to work in > practice, based on the lack of bug reports indicating otherwise. If you > have evidence to the contrary, please bring it to our attention. > > > Is it possible to publish the list of ABI incompatibilities between > > 2.0.11 and 2.0.12 specifically? > > I'm not aware of any. Great, this means the problem doesn't exist. Thanks.