From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.comp.gdb.patches,gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] Improved ^c support for gdb/guile Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2014 18:56:46 +0200 Message-ID: <83a9do741d.fsf@gnu.org> References: <834n3x8o7m.fsf@gnu.org> <83y519788a.fsf@gnu.org> <871tz0d5vc.fsf@gnu.org> <83iosc76kz.fsf@gnu.org> <87txbw9xp4.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1392742602 2550 80.91.229.3 (18 Feb 2014 16:56:42 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2014 16:56:42 +0000 (UTC) Cc: xdje42@gmail.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org, guile-devel@gnu.org To: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) Original-X-From: gdb-patches-return-110471-gdb-gdb-patches=m.gmane.org@sourceware.org Tue Feb 18 17:56:51 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: gdb-gdb-patches@plane.gmane.org Original-Received: from server1.sourceware.org ([209.132.180.131] helo=sourceware.org) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WFnyU-0006tO-BZ for gdb-gdb-patches@plane.gmane.org; Tue, 18 Feb 2014 17:56:50 +0100 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:date:from:subject:in-reply-to:to:cc:reply-to :message-id:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding :references; q=dns; s=default; b=Y5Zc7FWTAWG9/Ltxy9YI6keY7UazcQi 5OFtNHzd+UnXQt18BRRdV6hqAMmlNUXjFE9tmwg4McZ7C4IcNO++qjbemkzgc6zl f2K5G/H9h76Br90Roh1EeBqpt/3hKenk4KMMIiYq6ghKjofazGOfFEgsghDt0j8S 8EO7rM01vfU4= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:date:from:subject:in-reply-to:to:cc:reply-to :message-id:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding :references; s=default; bh=gIiHY53zn8/EgtFjAh5kaS2Pf3k=; b=VsbM0 pWoXfUvJwPnprZ1VUlizb+SM4eX030g7FeBvSfosQfjFUMN63Y3DQ5KI5/jKyMBU 2wZaqut+Hjk9YIMgyfCE8Tzfe9H6OcOSHkTWQQMwsNNmDBS22On9uqTxvXEZiQPS UCz+T3lLveVKmj7CJp0ahgT1El8r527YPsQ6cc= Original-Received: (qmail 31914 invoked by alias); 18 Feb 2014 16:56:41 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Original-Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Original-Received: (qmail 31877 invoked by uid 89); 18 Feb 2014 16:56:41 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_SOFTFAIL autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mtaout27.012.net.il Original-Received: from mtaout27.012.net.il (HELO mtaout27.012.net.il) (80.179.55.183) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Tue, 18 Feb 2014 16:56:40 +0000 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.mtaout27.012.net.il by mtaout27.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0N1700A00AXJ5500@mtaout27.012.net.il> for gdb-patches@sourceware.org; Tue, 18 Feb 2014 18:55:00 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by mtaout27.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0N17000GCAZOFU90@mtaout27.012.net.il>; Tue, 18 Feb 2014 18:55:00 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: <87txbw9xp4.fsf@gnu.org> X-IsSubscribed: yes Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.comp.gdb.patches:95473 gmane.lisp.guile.devel:16882 Archived-At: > From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) > Cc: xdje42@gmail.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org, guile-devel@gnu.org > Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2014 17:45:27 +0100 > > >> I don’t remember, Eli: do you have patches pending review for these > >> issues and other MinGW issues in Guile? > > > > I don't know, you tell me. I sent several changesets in June, > > in these messages: > > OK, will follow-up on guile-devel. Thanks. > >> The non-pthread code is used when Guile is built without pthread > >> support. In that case, the async is queued directly from the signal > >> handler. > > > > So why cannot this code be used by GDB? > > Because GDB uses whichever Guile is available. If the user has Guile > built with pthread support, then that’s what GDB uses. Sorry, I meant why that code couldn't be used when Guile was built without pthreads.