From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: Provide reasonable stack limit on MS-Windows Date: Thu, 03 Jul 2014 19:28:10 +0300 Message-ID: <831tu22yqt.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83r4233fdt.fsf@gnu.org> <87y4wbeape.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1404404932 9917 80.91.229.3 (3 Jul 2014 16:28:52 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 3 Jul 2014 16:28:52 +0000 (UTC) Cc: guile-devel@gnu.org To: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Jul 03 18:28:44 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1X2jsI-0003ZG-21 for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 03 Jul 2014 18:28:42 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:60782 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1X2jsH-00006S-EQ for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 03 Jul 2014 12:28:41 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:53185) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1X2js9-00006D-CB for guile-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 03 Jul 2014 12:28:39 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1X2js3-0007l0-Fg for guile-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 03 Jul 2014 12:28:33 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout20.012.net.il ([80.179.55.166]:51509) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1X2js3-0007kr-74; Thu, 03 Jul 2014 12:28:27 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout20.012.net.il by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0N8500A009EUZW00@a-mtaout20.012.net.il>; Thu, 03 Jul 2014 19:28:25 +0300 (IDT) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0N8500AIS9RDMO90@a-mtaout20.012.net.il>; Thu, 03 Jul 2014 19:28:25 +0300 (IDT) In-reply-to: <87y4wbeape.fsf@gnu.org> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 X-Received-From: 80.179.55.166 X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:17283 Archived-At: > From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Court=C3=A8s) > Cc: guile-devel@gnu.org > Date: Wed, 02 Jul 2014 23:02:05 +0200 >=20 > Eli Zaretskii skribis: >=20 > > The default value used by debug.c when getrlimit is not available= is > > too small (the default stack size of MinGW programs is 2MB). Thi= s > > small patch fixes that: >=20 > Looks good to me, please push. Done. > But it=E2=80=99s really problematic that we=E2=80=99re accumulating= all this while a > bunch of Gnulib modules would have done it; more work initially, bu= t > then more benefits. (Did I say that already? ;-)) Yes, you did say that. (There are no getrlimit module in Gnulib, FWIW.)