From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.ciao.gmane.io!not-for-mail From: =?UTF-8?Q?Linus_Bj=C3=B6rnstam?= Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: unhandled constant? Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2020 20:52:34 +0100 Message-ID: <773107ff-aaf6-4b37-ba50-4ee6e30ec54c@www.fastmail.com> References: <8d77f905-31e9-4d0b-973a-82be38360e07@www.fastmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="ciao.gmane.io:159.69.161.202"; logging-data="128486"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Cyrus-JMAP/3.1.7-781-gfc16016-fmstable-20200127v1 Cc: guile-devel@gnu.org To: "Han-Wen Nienhuys" Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Jan 31 20:53:17 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1ixcLs-000XMS-Db for guile-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 31 Jan 2020 20:53:16 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:58748 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ixcLr-00067o-9l for guile-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 31 Jan 2020 14:53:15 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:34612) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ixcLg-00067R-KS for guile-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 31 Jan 2020 14:53:05 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ixcLe-0006fM-IM for guile-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 31 Jan 2020 14:53:04 -0500 Original-Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.25]:37183) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ixcLe-0006ab-9V for guile-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 31 Jan 2020 14:53:02 -0500 Original-Received: from compute3.internal (compute3.nyi.internal [10.202.2.43]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE6B82249A; Fri, 31 Jan 2020 14:53:01 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from imap1 ([10.202.2.51]) by compute3.internal (MEProxy); Fri, 31 Jan 2020 14:53:01 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=veryfast.biz; h= mime-version:message-id:in-reply-to:references:date:from:to:cc :subject:content-type; s=fm1; bh=M+WHZBukWu3XEdzJaPSccOQsIIUaU80 UrwOF/FalE6s=; b=cSK3wNKk/2OFVuGsoO2bR69PsEs/JEiVLbVtXCg9BkFNsFf Th6O6OzDz4SeooawJX2ltBX4ppApkltcWEyIW8A3BtoeU42PPalon0xy8AIp6xAd OwkX5YfIqwHcKflq3mVfpQWKPknoRamdmx2NmaP0G0MTWwLxXuxfTf3CInHIhaAX maqaUdSk8+jL07wvKAcZKzk2X0n4IpBGYtw0SoZUWCCBLoC7k1+ocIjEAgM0pVKa m5OIUOd9KY8tPQf1zkVlIh5I01dz3RO5bL44fUm83HIKeMhKCVCyTpfhLcDgKp05 rPsmsMFZcmAq4mtX3VioXnOYAr8zChm8i+AzUdw== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=M+WHZB ukWu3XEdzJaPSccOQsIIUaU80UrwOF/FalE6s=; b=oeMvRmJy92o5Ib43GtzoPC oAvpqGFl0ipxWoVJg4c8povSDbqHi08UBb6sgzqgKpxPG68xsSbzQ4UIhd8u0Ry/ mLwFwao/h0eXfxh9narGZ63sSaJ+PIcHXD/FEnZm5mrvq1OoyNMmtlj9Yb2ysm53 unXeU7wL5ug70fdFFYeRm0pZfcYaBvOVN742AunSbu/mFejndrXYPbeNhrzhANR0 9hmPeAxC4OM8vecH26po0NzyU1VoFTYuZiPPzTHm3xMwOR9OFBG4dncRNCKc7mLF q1mpovJyYT50pdNWqC1147epC0d7I3LatswGhTGs9YiNh3kqyZVvyjkSI4zVqlag == X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedugedrgedtgdduvddvucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucenucfjughrpefofgggkfgjfhffhffvufgtsehttd ertderreejnecuhfhrohhmpefnihhnuhhspgeujhpnrhhnshhtrghmuceolhhinhhushdr sghjohhrnhhsthgrmhesvhgvrhihfhgrshhtrdgsihiiqeenucffohhmrghinhepghhnuh drohhrghenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhm pehlihhnuhhsrdgsjhhorhhnshhtrghmsehvvghrhihfrghsthdrsghiii X-ME-Proxy: Original-Received: by mailuser.nyi.internal (Postfix, from userid 501) id 9B5E4C200A6; Fri, 31 Jan 2020 14:53:01 -0500 (EST) X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface In-Reply-To: X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 66.111.4.25 X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "guile-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.lisp.guile.devel:20362 Archived-At: On Fri, 31 Jan 2020, at 20:17, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote: > > eval-when looks like it might be a solution to the puzzle , but > honestly, the doc at > > https://www.gnu.org/software/guile/manual/html_node/Eval-When.html > > has me mystified. When I run the example through guile 2.2 and > display *compilation-date*, > > I get a different answer each time. Shouldn't it be a fixed timestamp > (of when the compile happened?) Yup. At least from my understanding of the documentation, but whenever I try to do eval-when I become sad so I have just decided that I am too dumb for it. Try asking in the irc channel.