From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Grant Rettke Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: guile and elisp Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2010 13:32:55 -0500 Message-ID: <756daca51003291132l3f5bbe96w5c6398a8f922fb85@mail.gmail.com> References: <87tyrzfrik.fsf@gnu.org> <874ojze3q3.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1269887832 31152 80.91.229.12 (29 Mar 2010 18:37:12 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2010 18:37:12 +0000 (UTC) Cc: guile-devel@gnu.org To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Ludovic_Court=E8s?= Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Mar 29 20:37:05 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NwJpd-0007A1-DS for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 29 Mar 2010 20:37:01 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34530 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NwJpc-0007BF-Pq for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 29 Mar 2010 14:37:00 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NwJlj-000568-QD for guile-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 29 Mar 2010 14:32:59 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=37489 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NwJli-000556-Hz for guile-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 29 Mar 2010 14:32:59 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NwJlh-0003FW-EC for guile-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 29 Mar 2010 14:32:58 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-pw0-f41.google.com ([209.85.160.41]:59517) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NwJlh-0003FO-8A; Mon, 29 Mar 2010 14:32:57 -0400 Original-Received: by pwi2 with SMTP id 2so4235946pwi.0 for ; Mon, 29 Mar 2010 11:32:55 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:received:in-reply-to :references:date:x-google-sender-auth:received:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=4OLEW4sbTQCV47FE1jkGtHXdQ+17q/qIMoRnA7Pk9nY=; b=Ax5N2URZNnq7C6HoTsHeZYBjfLJJQqtvg/DiK5S7KCARNGxd7tXENvtLhOjIAOFy5/ KIXfOfByXMpnr1KSNgEbuZy6kv/Wt6vogk6U87+UjaRboAtnWQxOy1oM/Iql//U/VFpw ww3RSxN7GYOzGPM1yxYhodoJlnzI19v1T84J0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=Q+YT1KIK+Ly3E1x+qwHEivRSGdPqrliVYqOSivSuAjuuruEXAgX9mpClEcY2kG4tIy dZbgW0Oamu0J6+vuOtqCB2VQ50B21NRCjPu1uyAy3lzF1bNM5GZZ3tT93gg145PLHaaH mALqODgtW1uA/wAPdD5tRgt4cQTV015Hfak4I= Original-Received: by 10.231.148.68 with HTTP; Mon, 29 Mar 2010 11:32:55 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <874ojze3q3.fsf@gnu.org> X-Google-Sender-Auth: f821ba12069cd320 Original-Received: by 10.141.107.11 with SMTP id j11mr2076441rvm.199.1269887575391; Mon, 29 Mar 2010 11:32:55 -0700 (PDT) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:10112 Archived-At: On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 7:01 AM, Ludovic Court=E8s wrote: > What I meant is that Scheme=92s disjoint boolean type should be considere= d > the Right Thing. =A0I=92d rather keep it really disjoint, at the cost of > weaker/less trivial interop, than going the elisp road too far. Are you guys discussing something like a foreign function interface for Scheme to Elisp and vice versa? Sorry for the dense question as from what I have read it started very technical, and I am wondering what is the overarching vision.