From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Mikael Djurfeldt Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: Critical section review Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2005 21:35:06 +0100 Message-ID: <66e540fe05032312352e5faf68@mail.gmail.com> References: <424125C0.7000407@ossau.uklinux.net> <66e540fe050323010240b4da11@mail.gmail.com> <4241CF4A.8070906@ossau.uklinux.net> Reply-To: djurfeldt@nada.kth.se NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1111611121 24402 80.91.229.2 (23 Mar 2005 20:52:01 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2005 20:52:01 +0000 (UTC) Cc: guile-devel Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Mar 23 21:52:00 2005 Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DEClT-00070Y-HE for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 23 Mar 2005 21:47:43 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DED32-0004Bk-KP for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 23 Mar 2005 16:05:52 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1DECyv-0002Ef-Ln for guile-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 23 Mar 2005 16:01:37 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1DECyp-0002C0-JE for guile-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 23 Mar 2005 16:01:33 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DECyp-000238-20 for guile-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 23 Mar 2005 16:01:31 -0500 Original-Received: from [64.233.170.205] (helo=rproxy.gmail.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1DECZG-0004aL-M1 for guile-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 23 Mar 2005 15:35:06 -0500 Original-Received: by rproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id y7so302962rne for ; Wed, 23 Mar 2005 12:35:06 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=tvTCCuRwomkULm3I1sktsjhTcKXeryVT6XhYBRXrbqcghS8TDOhLt7HtOJtl/HPZ+iWqd2KvfS0RuKpIqPk1aE1J0mKfGFCB2coZc7Hk2z10b5BkgVYl4xvzIIYh9eiGIG0DdGRTcgLd0Dn06fIjczFBiJsqkvtml2R+BYCl5J8= Original-Received: by 10.38.181.47 with SMTP id d47mr906756rnf; Wed, 23 Mar 2005 12:35:06 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by 10.38.104.39 with HTTP; Wed, 23 Mar 2005 12:35:06 -0800 (PST) Original-To: Neil Jerram In-Reply-To: <4241CF4A.8070906@ossau.uklinux.net> X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org X-MailScanner-To: guile-devel@m.gmane.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:4867 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.guile.devel:4867 On Wed, 23 Mar 2005 20:19:22 +0000, Neil Jerram wrote: > So this is now just: > SCM_RETURN_NEWSMOB (scm_tc16_memoized, scm_cons (exp, env)); > > which is a completely mechanical change except that one SCM_UNPACK(...) > has become ((scm_t_bits) ...) - is the definition of SCM_NEWSMOB correct > in using (scm_t_bits) rather than SCM_UNPACK ? Well,I guess so. I'm no SCM_PACK/SCM_UNPACK expert. M _______________________________________________ Guile-devel mailing list Guile-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel