From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: srfe records in reworked match Date: Mon, 3 May 2010 15:35:24 +0200 Message-ID: <5D5E9099-F707-4E09-ACEA-6560064184D4@spray.se> References: <4FD647B9-C296-4F67-B72E-A03215BB8E11@spray.se> <87ljc1qhx1.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1077) Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-1-381264725 X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1272894273 18104 80.91.229.12 (3 May 2010 13:44:33 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 3 May 2010 13:44:33 +0000 (UTC) Cc: guile-devel@gnu.org To: ludo@gnu.org (=?iso-8859-1?Q?Ludovic_Court=E8s?=) Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon May 03 15:44:32 2010 connect(): No such file or directory Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1O8vwm-0001IU-GB for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 03 May 2010 15:44:32 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49964 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1O8vwm-00011n-0F for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 03 May 2010 09:44:32 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1O8vwb-00010K-Ig for guile-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 03 May 2010 09:44:21 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=44179 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1O8vwa-0000zk-CB for guile-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 03 May 2010 09:44:21 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1O8vwW-0000GI-BW for guile-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 03 May 2010 09:44:20 -0400 Original-Received: from spsmtp02oc.mail2world.com ([74.202.142.198]:1739) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1O8vrr-0007CN-Ml; Mon, 03 May 2010 09:39:27 -0400 Original-Received: from mail pickup service by spsmtp02oc.mail2world.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Mon, 3 May 2010 06:35:29 -0700 auth-sender: stefan.tampe@spray.se Original-Received: from 82.182.254.46 unverified ([82.182.254.46]) by spsmtp02oc.mail2world.com with Mail2World SMTP Server; Mon, 03 May 2010 06:35:27 -0700 In-Reply-To: <87ljc1qhx1.fsf@gnu.org> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1077) X-OriginalArrivalTime: 03 May 2010 13:35:29.0349 (UTC) FILETIME=[7EFDA750:01CAEAC5] X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Windows 2000 SP4, XP SP1+ X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:10313 Archived-At: --Apple-Mail-1-381264725 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 On May 3, 2010, at 2:38 PM, Ludovic Court=E8s wrote: > Hi Stefan, >=20 > Sorry for the delay. No problem, let's not stress and have fun instead. > Stefan writes: >=20 >>> Ok, I put the files in a tar directory and published it at >>> http:///c-lambda.se/match.tar.gz >=20 > Cool, thanks! >=20 > So you started from Shinn=92s latest match.scm, backported = record-related > stuff from its match-cond-expand.scm, and added Guile-specific record > handling, is that right? >=20 > Did you get in touch with him? I started with the suggested code, I also found a email associated with = that homepage and emailed to it. I'm still waiting for a response. >>> Should we make a more thorough test suite? >=20 > More thorough than what? Than =91examples.scm=92 if your tarball? Yep! I was thinking of going through the list of features and make sure = they=20 all work. > IMO most of this work ought to be done upstream (i.e., in = collaboration > with Alex Shinn), so that it benefits most people. Then we just need = a > thin layer to integrate it in Guile (e.g., have the test suite use > Guile=92s test-suite library.) >=20 > What do you think? I agree, it is most beneficial to make this portable. > Thanks, > Ludo=92. >=20 Cheers /Stefan --Apple-Mail-1-381264725 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/html; charset=windows-1252
Hi Stefan,

Sorry for the = delay.

No problem, let's not = stress and have fun instead.

Stefan <stefan.tampe@spray.se> = writes:

Ok, I = put the files in a tar directory and published it = at
http:///c-lambda.se/match.tar.gz=

Cool, thanks!

So you = started from Shinn=92s latest match.scm, backported = record-related
stuff from its match-cond-expand.scm, and added = Guile-specific record
handling, is that right?

Did you get in = touch with him?

I started with the = suggested code, I also found a email associated with = that
homepage and emailed to it. I'm still waiting for a = response.

Should we make a more thorough = test suite?

More thorough than what? =  Than =91examples.scm=92 if your = tarball?

Yep! I was thinking of = going through the list of features and make sure = they 
all work.

IMO most of this work ought to be done upstream = (i.e., in collaboration
with Alex Shinn), so that it benefits most = people.  Then we just need a
thin layer to integrate it in Guile = (e.g., have the test suite use
Guile=92s test-suite = library.)

What do you = think?

I agree, it is most = beneficial to make this portable.

Thanks,
Ludo=92.


Cheers

/Stefan

= = --Apple-Mail-1-381264725--