unofficial mirror of guile-devel@gnu.org 
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Brian <gomesbascoy@gmail.com>
To: guile-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Performance impact of top level definitions
Date: Tue, 08 May 2018 22:19:23 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <542e7f030ad122e035a353f44465d4d3158d7f8c.camel@gmail.com> (raw)

Hello,

Today I found that top level defines have a significant performance
impact on Guile (2.2.3). The following program takes about 108 seconds
to complete on my ThinkPad (an i5-5200U with Arch Linux):

(define node cons)
(define node-left car)
(define node-right cdr)

(define (make d)
  (if (= d 0)
      (node #f #f)
      (let ([d2 (1- d)])
        (node (make d2) (make d2)))))

(define (check t)
  (if (node-left t)
      (+ 1 (check (node-left t)) (check (node-right t)))
      1))

(define (main n)
  (define min-depth 4)
  (define max-depth (max (+ min-depth 2) n))
  (define stretch-depth (1+ max-depth))
  (format #t "stretch tree of depth ~a\t check: ~a\n" stretch-depth
(check (make stretch-depth)))
  (let ([long-lived-tree (make max-depth)])
    (do ([d 4 (+ d 2)]) ([not (< d (1+ max-depth))])
      (let ([iterations (ash 1 (+ (- max-depth d) min-depth))])
        (format #t "~a\t trees of depth ~a\t check: ~a\n"
                iterations
                d
                (let sum ([i iterations] [n 0])
                  (if (zero? i)
                      n
                      (sum (1- i) (+ n (check (make d)))))))))
    (format #t "long lived tree of depth ~a\t check: ~a\n"
            max-depth
            (check long-lived-tree))))

(main 21)


By simply wrapping that code in a lambda the program finished in about
47 seconds. Using lets instead of defines is equally effective.

I was quite surprised because I initially thought some optimization
would just substitute those useless nodes symbols away, but it seems
like that's not the case...

Cheers!






             reply	other threads:[~2018-05-09  5:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-05-09  5:19 Brian [this message]
2018-05-15  2:55 ` Performance impact of top level definitions Mark H Weaver
2018-05-15 16:55   ` Brian

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/guile/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=542e7f030ad122e035a353f44465d4d3158d7f8c.camel@gmail.com \
    --to=gomesbascoy@gmail.com \
    --cc=guile-devel@gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).