From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Per Bothner Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: [PATCH] Changes to SRFI-64 testing.scm to support Guile 2, etc. Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2014 07:46:19 -0800 Message-ID: <52E9224B.9090600@bothner.com> References: <87fvodi3rt.fsf@netris.org> <52E2CE1E.40109@bothner.com> <87a9eff9n6.fsf_-_@netris.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1391010401 7212 80.91.229.3 (29 Jan 2014 15:46:41 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2014 15:46:41 +0000 (UTC) Cc: guile-devel@gnu.org To: Mark H Weaver Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Jan 29 16:46:48 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1W8XLg-0007ld-1p for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 29 Jan 2014 16:46:44 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:43465 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W8XLf-0005tu-Kn for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 29 Jan 2014 10:46:43 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:57164) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W8XLX-0005rA-Vg for guile-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 29 Jan 2014 10:46:41 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W8XLR-0003A2-OK for guile-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 29 Jan 2014 10:46:35 -0500 Original-Received: from aibo.runbox.com ([91.220.196.211]:45006) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W8XLR-00039T-H5 for guile-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 29 Jan 2014 10:46:29 -0500 Original-Received: from [10.9.9.207] (helo=mailfront03.runbox.com) by bars.runbox.com with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W8XLP-0003Su-IP; Wed, 29 Jan 2014 16:46:27 +0100 Original-Received: from 207.33.45.31.customer.cdi.no ([31.45.33.207] helo=localhost.localdomain) by mailfront03.runbox.com with esmtpsa (uid:757155 ) (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.76) id 1W8XLH-0000yj-Iu; Wed, 29 Jan 2014 16:46:19 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0 In-Reply-To: <87a9eff9n6.fsf_-_@netris.org> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 91.220.196.211 X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:16856 Archived-At: On 01/29/2014 12:57 AM, Mark H Weaver wrote: > Hi Per, > > I've modified testing.scm to fully support Guile 2. It passes all tests > of srfi-64-test.scm, Thanks - I checked your changes into the Kawa repository. > except for the two expected failures. (What's the > story with those expected failures, btw? Do they pass on any system?) Not as far as I know. The first test-expect-fail in line 564 makes sense, as I don't see any code in test-group to increment the skip count or otherwise report a "result" for the group. It's kind of mushy what the result of a group *should* be - should we call the on-rst-end handler? I haven't looked into the test-expect-fail in line 747. -- --Per Bothner per@bothner.com http://per.bothner.com/