From: Tim Van den Langenbergh <tmt_vdl@gmx.com>
To: Blake Shaw <blake@nonconstructivism.com>
Cc: guile-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Re: Maintenance and future of Guile
Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2021 15:57:03 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4d937fb3-50d9-17e2-9228-342fdfe5b35d@gmx.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87r1a8icmd.fsf@nonconstructivism.com>
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2336 bytes --]
On 19/12/2021 21:05, Blake Shaw wrote:
> hi folks, from what I'm seeing here it seems like there are quite a few
> of us who are interested in engaging in steady, organized participation
> in Guile's upkeep, but we're unsure whether we're qualified. At the same
> time Ludo needs to find a replacement and Andy is apparently quite busy,
> and some issues in the ecosystem are apparently starting to show their teeth.
>
> personally I've been programming for about 15 years now but my career
> has been entirely in new media (video, graphics, audio), so while I've
> worked with plenty of lower-level libraries over the years, I didn't
> start to get an itch for compilers until covid happened. I was also
> doing a PhD in philosophy of mathematics at the time (which I've
> postponed indefinitely to prevent being separated from my partner during
> covid travel craziness) so I definitely think I have the *potential* to
> contribute to a project like Guile, its just a matter of finding the
> time to read some compiler books (which usually are neither short nor easy!).
>
> It sounds like others are coming from similar-ish places: you feel
> confident in your abilities to accede to the challenges, but lack the
> background that would enable you to take the initiative. So what are we
> TODO?
>
> In a situation like this, I would recommend that we form a little
> working group to collectively study the implementation of Guile, and
> with Ludo's suggestions come up with a roadmap for tackling various areas
> of the repo/compiler/infrastructure that need work, which we could then
> divide up among ourselves with each of us creating a presentation on our
> assigned areas, with group hack sessions following each bi-weekly (or
> whatever) presentation. This way we could distribute the knowledge
> aquisicition work in a structured fashion while forming a support group for
> developing a collective understanding of the codebase, as a cohort of
> sorts.
>
> wdyt?
>
> ez,
> blake
>
That sounds like a good idea, though I wonder what the best way to organise it would be.
IRC, Mattermost, and Rocket Chat seem like the most obvious options for chat. I don't know what would be best for task management, maybe some out-of-the-box kanban?
Ideas, anyone?
Vale,
-Tim.
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 840 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-12-20 14:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-12-19 20:05 Maintenance and future of Guile Blake Shaw
2021-12-19 20:41 ` Maxime Devos
2021-12-19 21:11 ` Olivier Dion via Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library
2021-12-19 21:50 ` Mike Gran
2021-12-20 14:57 ` Tim Van den Langenbergh [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2021-12-29 21:05 Blake Shaw
2021-12-29 21:57 ` Olivier Dion via Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library
2021-12-20 18:53 Blake Shaw
2021-12-29 16:23 ` Olivier Dion via Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library
2021-12-29 19:57 ` Dr. Arne Babenhauserheide
2021-12-15 13:35 Blake Shaw
2021-12-15 14:07 ` Ludovic Courtès
2021-12-13 22:18 Maintenance and future of Guile (was: [patch] Add instructions for sending patches) Jean Abou Samra
2021-12-15 10:20 ` Maintenance and future of Guile Ludovic Courtès
2021-12-16 21:15 ` Taylan Kammer
2021-12-17 14:51 ` Olivier Dion via Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library
2021-12-17 15:33 ` Artem Chernyak
2021-12-17 15:37 ` Ludovic Courtès
2021-12-17 15:48 ` Olivier Dion via Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library
2021-12-18 16:35 ` Taylan Kammer
2021-12-21 14:27 ` Ludovic Courtès
2022-08-19 16:49 ` Aleix Conchillo Flaqué
2022-08-19 18:46 ` zimoun
2022-08-19 19:06 ` Blake Shaw
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/guile/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4d937fb3-50d9-17e2-9228-342fdfe5b35d@gmx.com \
--to=tmt_vdl@gmx.com \
--cc=blake@nonconstructivism.com \
--cc=guile-devel@gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).