From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Neil Jerram" Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: Plan for 2.0 Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 13:47:00 +0000 Message-ID: <49dd78620901050547o5aeddcb7i7c01b4704a869362@mail.gmail.com> References: <49dd78620901031038i6f6c678o5cebc21b217374d2@mail.gmail.com> <20090104133522.5ef7df67@altosw.be> <49dd78620901040825gd7e1d72w61727d2db1cd37ef@mail.gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1231163303 10738 80.91.229.12 (5 Jan 2009 13:48:23 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 13:48:23 +0000 (UTC) Cc: guile-devel To: "=?ISO-8859-1?Q?David_S=E9verin?=" Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jan 05 14:49:33 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1LJppd-0005kc-1T for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 05 Jan 2009 14:49:25 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43700 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LJpoN-00012s-Nl for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 05 Jan 2009 08:48:07 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LJpoH-00012n-OH for guile-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 05 Jan 2009 08:48:01 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LJpoG-00012U-0a for guile-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 05 Jan 2009 08:48:01 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=44153 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LJpoF-00012R-RX for guile-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 05 Jan 2009 08:47:59 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-bw0-f12.google.com ([209.85.218.12]:62696) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LJpoF-0002D1-9w for guile-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 05 Jan 2009 08:47:59 -0500 Original-Received: by bwz5 with SMTP id 5so16326245bwz.18 for ; Mon, 05 Jan 2009 05:47:57 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=Rfyvikd+LFfbvR/Ob7XKjFYB79LyRHhAny4+jqJhncE=; b=jCXmEFb6t2IwhItUKz4ftIAlUikVqRjnCeX/TmxlLQDxXsOMwLzSVOjQvHRgsag2LK Ch1cY29WID2xYQyc+03LYCZeD8h6TkdyuGffJyGmF+0SSxTgM2QccRP91hpKXC6dCph4 ptnoM3Xuw2dFQkpjpAeBhJmLdIjaKpQnOnWQI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=d567ybwroR6apPxtuaM8GndOAmPXsJF/L5tGqeERYSfLFHToDa5XhrUOoExxpUa24V dMXj2Z9nRDIJcTtWfkOKd0prbM0IkyvDyGOSa3zmmsrTLyuS9mtbH2rTapctaIc/SLI7 hw1wquE9ybSzjyewK1Q262zfIwFhAbJiktqTM= Original-Received: by 10.181.139.10 with SMTP id r10mr8099238bkn.64.1231163220822; Mon, 05 Jan 2009 05:47:00 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by 10.180.205.8 with HTTP; Mon, 5 Jan 2009 05:47:00 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <49dd78620901040825gd7e1d72w61727d2db1cd37ef@mail.gmail.com> Content-Disposition: inline X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:7959 Archived-At: 2009/1/4 Neil Jerram : > 2009/1/4 David S=E9verin : >> Hi Guilers, >> >> It might be a small thing [and of course not a priority at all], but I'd= love to see >> a small evolution of the manual index structure in order to separate sch= eme >> procedures from others, scheme variables from others...: >> >> * Concept Index >> * Scheme Prodedure Index * C Procedure Index >> * Scheme Variable Index * C Variable Index >> * Scheme Type Index * C Type Index >> * R5RS Index >> >> Being a scheme 'only' programmer, I'd love not to have to scroll through >> gh_* and scm_* ... when I am looking for something in an index. > > Thanks for this idea! > > I'm not persuaded by the procedure/variable/type separation I'm sorry, that's complete nonsense, as we already have the procedure/variable/type separation. So in fact now I completely agree with what you've suggested. Regards, Neil