From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Neil Jerram" Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: Plan for 2.0 Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2009 16:25:47 +0000 Message-ID: <49dd78620901040825gd7e1d72w61727d2db1cd37ef@mail.gmail.com> References: <49dd78620901031038i6f6c678o5cebc21b217374d2@mail.gmail.com> <20090104133522.5ef7df67@altosw.be> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1231086361 1674 80.91.229.12 (4 Jan 2009 16:26:01 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2009 16:26:01 +0000 (UTC) Cc: guile-devel To: "=?ISO-8859-1?Q?David_S=E9verin?=" Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Jan 04 17:27:11 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1LJVok-0006g7-P9 for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 04 Jan 2009 17:27:11 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44007 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LJVnV-000554-EY for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 04 Jan 2009 11:25:53 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LJVnR-00054u-UY for guile-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 04 Jan 2009 11:25:49 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LJVnR-00054i-GQ for guile-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 04 Jan 2009 11:25:49 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=44879 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LJVnR-00054f-Bb for guile-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 04 Jan 2009 11:25:49 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-bw0-f12.google.com ([209.85.218.12]:39207) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LJVnR-00027n-0t for guile-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 04 Jan 2009 11:25:49 -0500 Original-Received: by bwz5 with SMTP id 5so15502807bwz.18 for ; Sun, 04 Jan 2009 08:25:47 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=kISZlC2aYwvy4o5FAwGIp1Go2jzPJqvpvROqUI12GbA=; b=ePCu0LCwiuG15hCBYahW9pFvZXzTc1qOrxCHbgngR7EirFtBcEgB+E63AxIYNQmdH5 L8oWUievHDzMneZy1Hx4T4VaCqBnso5slGplFHfI1qrzUyNHkVf4/XpZt3PF3wXHv66e K0U3+K7lu8qwY2LEDk02i/P+YWUEQnJeXmnI8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=JaBLKgh89VcZz7b5gVie/t6m0Qz38316xl0TIzkOLyKqu+M+BndDAyeLoJgYik8qKW VhOTj3dfPcZgqyJUOAuxnnP1MB/ZfIcW2Zy09VVu0Lmr47Cv77S5ORLzcc6apxfe5Wvw 6LtWy3fLjivaX1Znjom0SDjZ/1mzWHmcKwD7k= Original-Received: by 10.180.205.20 with SMTP id c20mr7122478bkg.62.1231086347833; Sun, 04 Jan 2009 08:25:47 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by 10.180.205.8 with HTTP; Sun, 4 Jan 2009 08:25:47 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20090104133522.5ef7df67@altosw.be> Content-Disposition: inline X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:7954 Archived-At: 2009/1/4 David S=E9verin : > Hi Guilers, > > It might be a small thing [and of course not a priority at all], but I'd = love to see > a small evolution of the manual index structure in order to separate sche= me > procedures from others, scheme variables from others...: > > * Concept Index > * Scheme Prodedure Index * C Procedure Index > * Scheme Variable Index * C Variable Index > * Scheme Type Index * C Type Index > * R5RS Index > > Being a scheme 'only' programmer, I'd love not to have to scroll through > gh_* and scm_* ... when I am looking for something in an index. Thanks for this idea! I'm not persuaded by the procedure/variable/type separation, but I agree that the Scheme/C separation would be useful. Do you know Texinfo well enough to look at how we could achieve this? Regards, Neil