From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Neil Jerram" Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: branch_release-1-8 not building Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2008 14:53:59 +0000 Message-ID: <49dd78620812140653s497db9c9na8bad29b334e44b9@mail.gmail.com> References: <49dd78620812101410p6ab915e6p1fbada49b404317c@mail.gmail.com> <87prjzfvn4.fsf@gnu.org> <49dd78620812101608p38e2b72dkb97815c5df86e853@mail.gmail.com> <87k5a69ydg.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1229266543 450 80.91.229.12 (14 Dec 2008 14:55:43 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2008 14:55:43 +0000 (UTC) Cc: guile-devel@gnu.org To: "=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Ludovic_Court=E8s?=" Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Dec 14 15:56:49 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1LBsOm-00014E-Dz for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 14 Dec 2008 15:56:48 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53620 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LBsNa-0004C6-H0 for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 14 Dec 2008 09:55:34 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LBsMC-0003jT-7z for guile-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 14 Dec 2008 09:54:08 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LBsM9-0003gF-G0 for guile-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 14 Dec 2008 09:54:07 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=34086 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LBsM9-0003g7-9Y for guile-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 14 Dec 2008 09:54:05 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-bw0-f12.google.com ([209.85.218.12]:64084) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LBsM5-0004Jc-R5; Sun, 14 Dec 2008 09:54:02 -0500 Original-Received: by bwz5 with SMTP id 5so4698085bwz.18 for ; Sun, 14 Dec 2008 06:54:00 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=i6CmS97k+uf/q8Kq6+GxnggPh7sR5lDueFcDvfQrHnc=; b=OqgwMN90RojU75hBTKeZ1wpsJzrCLnKQeh0Ov5Vbxf7doyiVjuOvOo9i/w9w8N40ta J2Tj2ESOEkPTVlgVp/mcXNcVghQ6EPyKvLBMZEtmJ3eV9sLud1u9HezVJRavsbwBC5Kl PgVRrQoZc+GUwV4nsOtFGj+iKhWkZsL2eU14c= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=GWhvsyj2ThydQJkkCHiK++2cIiQSP0QT5xGcX8Vk1qpNGqtn0jKXVoBd1kpXQvgBLP Uf5nTYsQNrPXZf9bxbSQSrABSE5SXIXlKQ2N8Sr2IofIBAXb4IVq7DbKHlsbmiuOdinp mWvzm1hq57sKwkNOVmssnKQeiH6cZ5hfc6I60= Original-Received: by 10.180.224.13 with SMTP id w13mr2146010bkg.160.1229266439983; Sun, 14 Dec 2008 06:53:59 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by 10.180.205.8 with HTTP; Sun, 14 Dec 2008 06:53:59 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <87k5a69ydg.fsf@gnu.org> Content-Disposition: inline X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:7930 Archived-At: 2008/12/11 Ludovic Court=E8s : > > Yes, `autoreconf' recurses. I'd happily live without `autogen.sh', but > feel free to update it to fit your needs. Thanks, I've done that now. Personally I do think it's useful to have a top level autogen.sh; it's almost standard to have one, so I think it's a nice cue for new developers. (If we didn't have it, I guess we should instead document our canonical build process in HACKING; that would be OK too IMO.) Neil