From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Neil Jerram" Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: Using define in multiple threads? Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 23:36:40 +0000 Message-ID: <49dd78620811191536o5ead332bt7dbc60128fd33957@mail.gmail.com> References: <3ae3aa420811161427t6b2c65d1q4adcd6e9a5689ddc@mail.gmail.com> <87od0ee6yl.fsf@gnu.org> <87od0dl4hy.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1227137819 7049 80.91.229.12 (19 Nov 2008 23:36:59 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 23:36:59 +0000 (UTC) Cc: guile-devel@gnu.org To: "=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Ludovic_Court=E8s?=" Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Nov 20 00:38:01 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1L2wcR-0000pt-JS for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 20 Nov 2008 00:37:59 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35945 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1L2wbI-00024R-PP for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 19 Nov 2008 18:36:48 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1L2wbF-00023o-5N for guile-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 19 Nov 2008 18:36:45 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1L2wbC-00023P-Oe for guile-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 19 Nov 2008 18:36:43 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=39151 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1L2wbC-00023M-J3 for guile-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 19 Nov 2008 18:36:42 -0500 Original-Received: from rv-out-0708.google.com ([209.85.198.251]:45531) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1L2wbC-0007eF-Hd for guile-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 19 Nov 2008 18:36:42 -0500 Original-Received: by rv-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id k29so182674rvb.6 for ; Wed, 19 Nov 2008 15:36:40 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=5QzYMKovdUZtNI2rMxVFSdVgHNsW6+2bFt4WPYUKTTk=; b=JxdKBYeKS8dm4Go3+NdWSSFC8YV3fzrdBEPT2KNiaZMjHHkrSZK4sUMuGUq12kfNE8 SrQI1NeqMMBEwyX5TqlYcCyTeI1N6+46ClIwJhllBWzL2vA0BoaM3lMdaHIKNRYVOEJt bRWTeL1zkosI5LOGQTb6wFcLTZttqh2QKNfJ8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=DlblG0RrLEAsqGRlVx66gFuVjDPWBE0eecRIOjNSyrrUQY0oXKj3g3Bb9YuW1wgbqW NotqZf3VzO6GHMEfQCd0sas6B6RH+EG4oo9yinS4vCnveFwm8RA7ggI7tEDivJot750L JpPTtZB9VcIsGCWLGQJxpHsy+z57lLpcK8D6U= Original-Received: by 10.141.196.19 with SMTP id y19mr870696rvp.173.1227137800705; Wed, 19 Nov 2008 15:36:40 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by 10.140.142.15 with HTTP; Wed, 19 Nov 2008 15:36:40 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <87od0dl4hy.fsf@gnu.org> Content-Disposition: inline X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:7862 Archived-At: 2008/11/18 Ludovic Court=E8s : > > I submitted a bug: https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/index.php?24867 . I'm > not sure whether this can easily be fixed in 1.8, since that would > require adding a mutex to `module-type' and access it from C, which > would break the ABI. Ideas? Where exactly is the troublesome hash table? (There's a lot of code underneath scm_m_define(), so if you've already tracked it down, that would save a little time.) Regards, Neil