From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Neil Jerram" Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: full moon, vm status update Date: Sat, 18 Oct 2008 11:26:31 +0100 Message-ID: <49dd78620810180326i636e9275v7eba6a0ada606e44@mail.gmail.com> References: <87y70owdeq.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1224325747 27519 80.91.229.12 (18 Oct 2008 10:29:07 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 18 Oct 2008 10:29:07 +0000 (UTC) Cc: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Ludovic_Court=E8s?= , guile-devel@gnu.org To: "Andy Wingo" Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Oct 18 12:30:07 2008 connect(): Connection refused Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Kr94M-0008Df-By for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 18 Oct 2008 12:30:02 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44564 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Kr93G-0006fT-3D for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 18 Oct 2008 06:28:54 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Kr912-0006HD-SU for guile-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 18 Oct 2008 06:26:37 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Kr90z-0006GQ-GH for guile-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 18 Oct 2008 06:26:35 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=57029 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Kr90y-0006G3-Q6 for guile-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 18 Oct 2008 06:26:33 -0400 Original-Received: from rv-out-0708.google.com ([209.85.198.248]:2026) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Kr90z-00032J-8H for guile-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 18 Oct 2008 06:26:33 -0400 Original-Received: by rv-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id k29so1080947rvb.6 for ; Sat, 18 Oct 2008 03:26:31 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=OhAWRvs/S4X+u61ihv0EnDJf2BffdGxs7+3WLQdhx5c=; b=Ca9r9aIn63iM91nhQHu1YPFg0k5aikbZa9D2WZusNQYb069uvDT6oaIeJvjf3b9EYa sHcBFwQaDDHIzXnEh5v8yR+ETagMFoPk1EQ5wDiiNXd3CK5cOkBufADGFazZmEhPwxdn HLaf5nw0mBSMWCGcwQSajvrxE0XHpa4Fy1k8g= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=xsFs5nKGoIS09VP1d7FDLqlN43XxEfWruFcoL3bAsE5R9lSgVCk6uivYoFsKHMh3G8 h3jGEmvWEplXr4Bp/ArSwB83PnYy4TYVt9SviLoueFwhrnNYdUTUo91KeO1VKx/9xhN5 ABBH1iHw2Ce72j86FXADGe8rbWCzM72uPAAA0= Original-Received: by 10.140.178.17 with SMTP id a17mr3210984rvf.156.1224325591260; Sat, 18 Oct 2008 03:26:31 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.141.177.4 with HTTP; Sat, 18 Oct 2008 03:26:31 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: Content-Disposition: inline X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:7789 Archived-At: 2008/10/16 Andy Wingo : >>> * Actually the bit about all of the test suites passing was a lie in >>> another respect: the elisp test fails, with a C stack overflow, >>> indicating too much recursion into the interpreter. >> >> I've seen `elisp.test' trigger a stack overflow with the interpreter >> more often than any other test. Don't know why. > > I hacked around this -- see what I've pushed to vm for more info. I plan to take a look at this after the srfi-18.test hang. (Not that that should stop anyone else, of course.) Neil