From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Neil Jerram" Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: Stack calibration Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2008 19:04:13 +0100 Message-ID: <49dd78620810101104r5a43316tbf96865db5750918@mail.gmail.com> References: <47B2A8DF.9070004@tammer.net> <87hc8lw0q2.fsf_-_@gnu.org> <49dd78620809271120j17097ffq4da8f2b8dffd4efd@mail.gmail.com> <87abdsf337.fsf@gnu.org> <49dd78620809301510q173d1777rd26240ce40f204f0@mail.gmail.com> <49dd78620810021530u8f29699x88fa8c0241105a07@mail.gmail.com> <87d4ide4md.fsf@gnu.org> <49dd78620810061611v2e67d646v29b479ca1fb23274@mail.gmail.com> <49dd78620810091553gbb10a0aod55076f5eb93b28b@mail.gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1223661906 17737 80.91.229.12 (10 Oct 2008 18:05:06 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2008 18:05:06 +0000 (UTC) Cc: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Ludovic_Court=E8s?= , guile-devel@gnu.org To: "Greg Troxel" Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Oct 10 20:05:59 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1KoMMk-0007Az-0b for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 10 Oct 2008 20:05:49 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58884 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KoMLe-0006Ul-FV for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 10 Oct 2008 14:04:22 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KoMLa-0006Tu-LI for guile-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 10 Oct 2008 14:04:18 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KoMLY-0006TM-Vg for guile-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 10 Oct 2008 14:04:18 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=33955 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KoMLY-0006TI-Rv for guile-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 10 Oct 2008 14:04:16 -0400 Original-Received: from rv-out-0708.google.com ([209.85.198.248]:43758) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KoMLX-0006rr-Q8 for guile-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 10 Oct 2008 14:04:16 -0400 Original-Received: by rv-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id k29so700771rvb.6 for ; Fri, 10 Oct 2008 11:04:13 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=uRTgMfbLo1I+g6WShhfq74wR4EbMrof1AiISnHcc4F4=; b=iUfKIHo8w4t1lvUUtIjr6I5pLdIDyP4Na1PEcVphimKwFZ6kBhZNr9YRriW10T7LGX EoiUThHKt/WvJ4uy8+7W+1W5D/RiaJmWN1oHBmDgwCvDXCq3ObhhyZfXJPKvhEoPUomQ dFMVrpeCl9IpSHKizqE6eEVK2ESzCYRJj09q4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=F84i48rcZMygAiv4kzi5RVoji6mL+fqz+5FGkNpWXb0BZroVEtkLATVT/bI6xGuXnl l7v2eAM5RRdcYg8sXHGMtQeC3dDV+s0ptSMl5OAEuy+EuM3BwNgFqeqDJdJSKThSnm8i qxWx8RZDy7ADxlPhCmus80AFlgMys4TfMMWNg= Original-Received: by 10.141.29.21 with SMTP id g21mr1333800rvj.248.1223661853678; Fri, 10 Oct 2008 11:04:13 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.141.177.4 with HTTP; Fri, 10 Oct 2008 11:04:13 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: Content-Disposition: inline X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:7764 Archived-At: On 10/10/2008, Greg Troxel wrote: > I am not really following, but does this make it harder to cross-compile > guile than it is now? I don't think so. In the Guile build, 'make' already executes the built guile in order to generate the online help (guile-procedures.txt). With this patch, 'make' will run guile again to generate stack-limit-calibration.scm, which is then used by 'make check'. If running the built guile is a problem in your project, you presumably cannot do 'make check'. In that case, you could suppress the generation of stack-limit-calibration.scm by removing it from BUILT_SOURCES in libguile/Makefile.am. Perhaps there is an incantation for doing that automatically when cross-compiling? - patch welcome! Does that sound OK? Let me know what you think. Neil