From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Neil Jerram" Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel,gmane.linux.debian.ports.hppa Subject: Re: Guile FTBFS on hppa - problem in detecting stack direction? Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2008 23:04:13 +0200 Message-ID: <49dd78620808071404s32a1fac5t8db42f31448c4d48@mail.gmail.com> References: <49dd78620808061338k3c29bd77o9d38d0706e0c5dca@mail.gmail.com> <119aab440808070527o5c514d7wcbeb8dd4ca09c247@mail.gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1218143106 14612 80.91.229.12 (7 Aug 2008 21:05:06 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2008 21:05:06 +0000 (UTC) Cc: guile-devel@gnu.org, debian-hppa@lists.debian.org To: "Carlos O'Donell" Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Aug 07 23:05:53 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1KRCg6-0007lU-Ji for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 07 Aug 2008 23:05:49 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56559 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KRCfB-0004hQ-5S for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 07 Aug 2008 17:04:49 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KRCej-0004V3-HK for guile-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Aug 2008 17:04:21 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KRCed-0004S6-RI for guile-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Aug 2008 17:04:21 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=48963 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KRCed-0004Rn-Lg for guile-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Aug 2008 17:04:15 -0400 Original-Received: from qb-out-1314.google.com ([72.14.204.169]:37248) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KRCed-0000jW-8b for guile-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Aug 2008 17:04:15 -0400 Original-Received: by qb-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id d2so672869qbc.30 for ; Thu, 07 Aug 2008 14:04:13 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=m/waSZcp/tUu2w5FnO9O4/ClNG5qoRDN9uswZMiENaM=; b=VtzIjx1I7EmNmjmEC8N0Pu5ryzK+gASNpLOgxVo4+sPh32C5fb5DJKDvbkRVJkl3X3 4sJ5nnHaGFCMQl1LNK91pvU4nFxawtMZyfLCAcW6AVsH0YVwsy8p1aMocOLKbj/L59jP 5kl7eslG6J7wnt4RqwM5cAPlI1ELGEjA19K1s= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=NSWTYoyiUJaDYv2n+5YW33oWjmZJaoDQHeoG+jai+cxDLWITTRwrP/LQGmMO39BXe/ 4zYyRcKIvB85jn8lAdbZNAbHJOuuFePksip5pWyWv5YRiV6XrcebKbm7kPliRxU2Qtyo 1UaL4vDlZyrgriTMmwT6wUcytzGQyFX6v6kpU= Original-Received: by 10.115.79.8 with SMTP id g8mr1667278wal.215.1218143053439; Thu, 07 Aug 2008 14:04:13 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.114.197.8 with HTTP; Thu, 7 Aug 2008 14:04:13 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <119aab440808070527o5c514d7wcbeb8dd4ca09c247@mail.gmail.com> Content-Disposition: inline X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:7413 gmane.linux.debian.ports.hppa:5429 Archived-At: 2008/8/7 Carlos O'Donell : > On Wed, Aug 6, 2008 at 4:38 PM, Neil Jerram wrote: >> SCM_I_GSC_STACK_GROWS_UP=0 > > Move this line. [...] > Tell me if that fixes your problem with cached variable detection. > > Cheers, > Carlos. Many thanks. I haven't tried it yet, but I expect you are right; sorry for making such a silly mistake! Regards, Neil