Re: Patch: Some work towards making --disable-deprecated compile

[Daniel Kraft <d@domob.eu>]

Ludovic Courtès wrote:
>> here's my patch from last december to fix some internal
>> inconsistencies that prevented guile from compiling with
>> --disable-deprecated at that time.  I've now my copyright assignment
>> in place, so when it is ok you could commit it at any time.  The patch
>> is updated to the current revision.
> 
> Thanks!  I've committed it with minor formatting changes:
> 
>   http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guile.git/commit/?id=6ab8238d99f477ee7ac12f1f1a3ec70aab3e68c7

Thank you very much, Ludo!

> BTW, next time, could you fix your Git user name and email configuration
> (which appears in the patch), and provide the change log as part of the
> Git log (so that the patch can be applied quickly with git-am(1))?

I will try so; unfortunatelly I'm still a little fighting with git, as 
this was/is the first time for me to use it.  And while I really like 
the apparent features with regards to local branching and the like, I'm 
just missing some experience working with it for now :)

> However, there's still another issue:
> 
>   $ ./pre-inst-guile -q --debug -c 0
>   ;;; Succeeds.
> 
>   $ ./pre-inst-guile -q --debug -c '(use-modules (ice-9 r5rs))'
> 
>   Backtrace:
>   In current input:
>      1:  0* (use-modules (ice-9 r5rs))
>      1:  1  (eval-when (eval load compile) (process-use-modules (list (list #))) ...)
>      1:  2  (begin (process-use-modules (list (list #))) *unspecified*)
>      ?:  3* [process-use-modules (((ice-9 r5rs)))]
>      ?:  4  (let* ((interfaces #)) (call-with-deferred-observers (lambda () #)))
>      ?:  5* [map #<procedure #f (mif-args)> (((ice-9 r5rs)))]
>      ?:  6* [#<procedure #f (mif-args)> ((ice-9 r5rs))]
>      ?:  7* (or (apply resolve-interface mif-args) (error "no such module" mif-args))
>      ?:  8* [apply #<procedure resolve-interface (name . args)> ((ice-9 r5rs))]
>      ?:  9  [resolve-interface (ice-9 r5rs)]
>       ...
>      ?: 10  (let* (# # # # ...) (and # #) (if # public-i #))
>      ?: 11* (and (or (not #) (not #)) (error "no code for module" name))
>      ?: 12  [error "no code for module" (ice-9 r5rs)]
>       ...
>      ?: 13  [scm-error misc-error #f "~A ~S" ("no code for module" (ice-9 r5rs)) #f]
> 
>   <unnamed port>: In procedure scm-error in expression (scm-error (quote misc-error) #f ...):
>   <unnamed port>: no code for module (ice-9 r5rs)
> 
> Looking with strace(1) shows that ice-9/r5rs.{scm,go} aren't loaded at
> all here.

Hm... No ideas yet, but I will look into that problem now; and maybe I 
can  still find the solution, even though I'm not yet really 
knowledge-able about Guile's code :D

Yours,
Daniel